Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's modern world smartphones have become an indispensable part of almost every person's life. However like every coin that has two sides; smartphones have affected the society in a both positive and negative manner. However I do not agree with the fact that the cons of the smartphones outweigh their benefits. This is due to the tremendous benefits they have in our personal, social and professional lives.
Smartphones have indeed brought the world closer. People who are thousands of miles away from each other are not only able to talk to one another but also see each other via video calls all due to smartphones. For example an old person whose children and grandchildren live in a different country is able to see them and converse with them everyday only with the help of a smart phone in absence of these smartphones, it would have been very hard for him to write letters to them and then wait for days until they reach the other nation. Thus smartphones have definitely proven to be boon and reduced the communication gap.
Smartphones have been of much help to people at individual level as well. For instance, a youngster who has started living alone and does not know how to cook can easily surf online for various recipes. He could also call or text his family and friends asking for their help. Smartphones can also be of assistance to him in other routine activities like fixing electric appliances, ordering for various commodities online and so on. Thus smartphones have without a doubt been of help to individuals to get through their day to day activities.
In one's professional life as well smartphones have used their magic and made it easier. For example various money transactions, business deals, international meetings can be done with their help. If a person is sick and is unable to physically report to work, he can do all his job over his phone staying at home. Thus work life has been positively impacted due to smartphones.
Thus, due to various benefits that smart phones have in all walks of life, I am of the strong opinion that smartphones have in no way caused greater harm than good to the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-13 | amchoi0810 | 90 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | RAMJI JAISI BHUSAL | 60 | view |
| 2022-02-08 | poojansharma | 76 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | Pyae Pyae Aung | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-11 | Pat_mat_345 | 70 | view |
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children s beh 50
- The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve This sanctuary is essential to the survival of the 300 bird species that live in our area Although only a small percentage of the land wi 60
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 70
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children s beh 58
- Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...e an indispensable part of almost every persons life. However like every coin that has ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...in a both positive and negative manner. However I do not agree with the fact that the c...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[2]
Message: Consider using 'do disagree that' or 'do agree that'.
Suggestion: do disagree that; do agree that
...positive and negative manner. However I do not agree with the fact that the cons of the smartphones outweigh th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...indeed brought the world closer. People who are thousands of miles away from each other...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 538, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...days until they reach the other nation. Thus smartphones have definitely proven to b...
^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...r various commodities online and so on. Thus smartphones have without a doubt been o...
^^^^
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...his job over his phone staying at home. Thus work life has been positively impacted ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7688172043 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66914232118 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561827956989 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6790789093 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94444444444 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179314217419 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622086799773 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494990367408 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114223563748 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504894412778 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.