Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sports teach people lessons about life?
Human beings are complex creatures. They show different behavior in different conditions. In fact, our characteristics depending on a lot of factors like our family characteristics, the atmosphere of society in which we grew, the activities we do during our life and so on. Even though, many people are in the opinion that characteristic of human beings have any to do with the activities they do in their lives. But, I, personally, think the activities like sports teach individuals many valuable lessons about life. Each sport need some specific characteristic to success on. And also, all team sports bring people some common qualities like teamwork and cooperative spirit with which human can live easier in their lives.
In first place, people to do any activity and work profitably, must gain some specific characteristics. Sports are one such activities. For example, mountain climbing needs people who are patient, planner, curious, diligence and so forth. Or by seeing it in another way, during climbing a mountain, it is possible to be hopeless because of the long distance and tiredness, or be frustrated when you see someone failed to climb. In these conditions you must just keep your way, try to be patient, think positively and don’t compare yourself with others. You need just make reasonable decision about your way and the time of climbing and resting. These experiences affect your personality by learning something new during these activities. In the first, maybe these new lessons are applied just during those activities, but after a while we will see them part of our characteristics in our lives.
Secondly, one essencial characteristic for everyone to hold social life is cooperativeness. All people, from children to adult, will encounter with some situation in which they need a cooperative spirit. Individuals can enhance the very characteristic by joining to a team sport like volleyball, football and so more. In team sports all members must act relating to each other. If a member makes a wrong during play, others must act supportive and compensate the very wrong all together. A team sport group cannot be success unless they make a sense of caring about each other and power their teamwork. They must be united in all the time of their game. These demands of playing team sports make all member after a while cooperativeness. They are able to work and do other tasks cooperatively if they need. Their social lives have high quality because of their ability to share tasks with other and do teamwork in their workplaces, universities and so on.
In sum, I think people can learn many lessons from sports. Each specific sport bring them some new valuable characteristics like being patient, diligent and so. It is not to mention that all team sports power the individuals' cooperative spirit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-28 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 70 | view |
- material found in deliberately broken T.rex's leg bone by researchers 80
- tv or telephone 76
- Robert E. Peary's claim, a well-known adventure and arctic explorer, about reaching to North Pole in 1909 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students who keep their rooms neat and organized will be more likely to succeed than students who do not. 73
- in some countries, teenagers have jobs while they are still students. do you think this is a good idea? 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i think, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2369.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09462365591 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92384078793 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47311827957 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 732.6 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4085639539 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6071428571 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6071428571 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.03571428571 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20232871605 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571422338128 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493846326989 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133198598948 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045379146807 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.