Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, the issue of students' success engendered copious controversies among people. Some people incline toward the opinion that the ability of social skill is essential for success in a future job. Some others, however, may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that studying hard in school helps juveniles to become prosperous in a future work. As far as I am concerned, studying hard are more important for people. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite reason is that studying hard helps students to increase their knowledge and extend their mind. Nowadays, the development of the technology happen at a very fast pace and because of this changes, many jobs are being invented. Hence, if the students have the basic knowledge of the science, he can easily understand this new job. It is obvious that he can easily progress in his future job and become successful which is an arduous task for other people. For example, when a student learns about physics and math in the school completely, he can easily understand all the events happen in the world and explain them.
The second significant point supporting my idea is that studying hard at school helps them to attend the great university. One of the ways that a person can advance in his life, is attending in university. Therefore, it is vital for him to study hard at school because the requirement for attending well-known universities is to have high GPA at school. For instance, a student who just tries to improve his ability to talk to other people is going to waste all his time since it is more crucial for him to study and by not doing it, it is plausible he loses his chance to attend university. Moreover, people are going to learn how to relate other people to the university because they are going to spend most of their time with different students.
The make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, reading hard in school is more require for people since it helps them to enhance their knowledge and attends in best universities. Consequently, it is highly recommended that to encourage and inspire young people to try extremely hard in their school time. In fact, there are myriad of other reasons, challenging the above statement, which could be mentioned but is not embrace due to the dearth of time
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | DHANDA | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | sarah halawani | 65 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | liviapabreu | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Somayya | 76 | view |
- TPO48 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 73
- TPO8 3
- TPO 8 the Chevalier s memoir accuracy 80
- The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ppen at a very fast pace and because of this changes, many jobs are being invented. ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
... to enhance their knowledge and attends in best universities. Consequently, it is highl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88697788698 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7037858004 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515970515971 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.175387097 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6111111111 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327083520123 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954487150131 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660585374024 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190931032885 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065739658359 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.