Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Nowadays, No one can cast doubt on the government and education system thereof have a paramount significance in the development and improvement of a country; assigning special education and spend more money on some group of people- very young children- is quite becoming trendy among the governments in the world. It is my empathetic belief the government and education system should spend their money in equal manner and should increase funding amount as the degrees get higher gradually.
If I were asked to determine a couple of reasons standing behind my points of view, I strongly suggest, as levels of study go in a higher rank, the government should spend money more, the requisites of adult study seems to be more wanted money than children. I will manifest my reasons in the subsequent paragraphs.
It is without an adumbration of doubt that higher education such as bachelor, graduate, post-graduate studies seem to be a professional one, thereby needing more funding and infrastructures. Nonetheless, the young children (five to ten years old) are blocks of future prosperity; the government must spend money meticulously and provide the facility to children enough; My personal experience is compelling evidence of what I mean: when I was in intermediate school, I did not need to any technological device such as compute, laptop, tablet, and so forth, the government helps the high-level student to provide their needs, and It is costly.
It also goes without declaring that university plays a vital role in the education system, being a good educational system notwithstanding, the university is a cultural, sport, art center; these perplex system demands more afford and money. The university is not a single complex system; rather, it involved all groups of administrative such banks, post, offices and all of the things; To be more specific, when I was a study at the University of Isfahan, I see the cost of such a huge system attributed to the dining, housing, sports clubs, student service, there are not such cost in high school.
It can be summed up in accentuating that For the prosperousness of a country, it is more crucial for a system to spend money on the education of adult people than to spend money on high school or school more. These more demands from university and the quality of such a study verify my points of view.
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called Phytophthora ramorum or P ramorum was first detected in the forests of the western United States P ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees in many infected oaks leaves wither rapidly la 76
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifolia a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida started to die out No one is sure exactly what caused the decline but chances are good that if nothing is done Torreya will soon become extinct Experts are co 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d my points of view, I strongly suggest, as levels of study go in a higher rank, ...
^^
Line 9, column 368, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...istrative such banks, post, offices and all of the things; To be more specific, when I was...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nonetheless, so, i mean, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1979.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03562340967 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9679138873 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521628498728 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 20.1344086022 194% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.337393596 48.9658058833 229% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 197.9 100.406767564 197% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.3 20.6045352989 191% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303453498623 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121751830301 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896728273133 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182070116634 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649528841405 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 11.7677419355 187% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 58.1214874552 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 10.1575268817 182% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.0537634409 175% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.