In the modern era, people, especially youngsters, are rounded by technology, and everyone without exception has a device to be aware of all news around the world. Social media, nowadays, link the people to each other and spread the news as soon as it happens. Political and social events are the most popular issues that all people are interested in. Personally, I believe that teachers should not indicate their opinion about the social and political matters. I feel this way by two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, in the current scenario, people are suffering from hustle and bustle of their lives, if this kind of issued implied by teachers, this would make some disagreements among the class, because every one has different opinion by convincing reasons in the class. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I remember when my brother was a freshman in the university; his teacher demonstrated that the representative of Afghanistan should abdicate, because he could not bring peace in our country. As soon as she indicated her view, all of the students started argument about that. Some were against the idea of teacher and some were in favor of her idea. This crisis made the class out of control and caused bad consequence.
Secondly, the student could not concentrate to their lessons. As the university or school is not the place of argument or stating our own point of view among the class, the teacher should present the academic subject and attract the student’s attention. By the way, the lesson would be as desirable as the student could learn. For example: In my brother class all the class divided into two parts, one aggregation were against teacher, the other were agreed with teacher, this made a severe situation in their class and this means that students focused on some bootless issues instead of their lecture.
To draw a main conclusion, according to my perspective, teachers should not state their idea about the social or political issues, I made two reasons for my claim. the first one was that it would make a contention in the class, and the other was that it would be disruptive in the class.
- TOEFL T P O 32 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-31- Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to s 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific reasons and examples to support you 60
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 553, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...try. As soon as she indicated her view, all of the students started argument about that. S...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ssues, I made two reasons for my claim. the first one was that it would make a cont...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88172043011 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63696386937 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508064516129 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4513819839 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.823529412 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194923511969 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636873680354 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493559382043 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12581638466 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242241028147 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.