Thorough the history of mankind progress in technology has been played a significant role in people's life. As consequences of these changes, some people believe that technology has made children less creative, while others look at these changes from different lenses and are against this idea. From my own perspective, I highly support the second idea and in the next paragraphs will delve into the main reasons which I think are logical.
The main reason is that by using technology children are able to learn faster. The results of one experiment indicated that children who use modern devices based on new technology can learn much faster than those who use conventional methods.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that technology lets people especially children to communicate with other parts of the world without going out from home. Nowadays due to the advanced level of technology, it is possible to speak with people who are far from us by clicking only one link without doing any effort. So as the results children won't leave the house to call their friends or speak to them.
Although all aforementioned reasons are those which may one finds out at first glance, there is still one reason. by comprising the speed of technology development, it is clear that in the past there was not this level of progress in technology. It is not coherence to compare the level of activities children in the past with now because 100 years ago there was not any kind of technology and even for doing simple tasks, people had to do a lot of physical works. So that can be the main reason why some believes that the rate of activity by children decreased.
To make a long story short, the effect of technology in new life is undeniable. If one weighs the merits and demerits of the above statement, one soon realizes that the positive effects of technology are much more than negatives. Consequently, it is highly recommended that before letting children use new devices, it is necessary to teach them at first in order to prevent problems in the future.
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement people benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...irst glance, there is still one reason. by comprising the speed of technology deve...
^^
Line 7, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rate of activity by children decreased. To make a long story short, the effect ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, look, may, second, so, still, while, i think, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84788732394 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62179230336 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557746478873 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6048710816 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.733333333 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230491679211 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076013871376 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404718880468 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125054823283 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298669069751 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.