Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The development of technology has various influences on people's lives, in particular, youngsters' creativeness is also affected. I believe that children have became more creative thanks to novel innovations including mechanical structures, the internet, and chat rooms. I feel that these three high-tech matters facilitated new opportunities for adolescence to be creative, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, kids are interested in mechanical arrangements; they are willing to invent new things themselves. Juveniles have ready access to various devices or even toys that contain fascinating structures. Therefore, they will be motivated to study these matters, and accomplish similar, not to say better, stuff themselves. For instance, when I was young, I found a broken phone from my home, and then I started separating portions of this device. As soon as I open and see inside part of the phone, I attempted to fix the phone for hours due to my interest caused by technology. Needless to say, I could not reach my goal, but I became creative after this day. Moreover, this experience made me to devote myself to mathematics and physics because I wanted to obtain knowledge. This example demonstrates how young kids can become innovative by learning technologies themselves.
Secondly, the internet allowed youngsters to absorb knowledge easily, so they can use the information to try new things. Several years ago, people were unable to accomplish things that they are interested in because of the lack of knowledge. On the other hand, n modern society, most of the children use the world wide web and the virtual network through which they can read fascinating things. Thereby, they will be encouraged to do things with which they are unfamiliar. To sum up, the information on the internet will help children to cope with any burden while trying new things because they have easy access to knowledge.
Finally, some chatrooms facilitated people to find others with whom they share similar interests and ideas, which means they will do things together. The majority of children have accounts of social platforms including, but not limited to, Facebook, and Instagram. Fortunately, they can join communities or groups of people who love comparable things. Consequently, they will find suitable partners in order to accomplish something new. For instance, my brother was willing to build a robot since he was eight years old. Nonetheless, he had not even attempted to attain what he wanted until he found a Facebook group of named "robot lovers". Luckily, he found several friends who were also wishing to create a robot. Eventually, they accomplished their goal by working with each other. Long story short, kids can find companions from social media, so they can do things together.
In summation, technology actually facilitated several chances for children to become innovative about matters. They may interest in things as soon as they realize interesting things. Moreover, juveniles can use data on the internet to do things that they want to carry out. Additionally, individuals can form a team with others in order to attempt impressive things by employing chatrooms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-01 | aaronahmed | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | anman | 87 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | anman | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 78
- Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways or should governments spend more money on improving transportation buses trains subways Why 70
- TPO 37 Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well 66
- Some people think that they can learn much more by themselves than if they work with a teacher Others think that it is always better to get help from a skilled teacher Which do you prefer Use specific reasons to support your choice 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
... affected. I believe that children have became more creative thanks to novel innovatio...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 691, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
.... Luckily, he found several friends who were also wishing to create a robot. Eventually, they acc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, i feel, in particular, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2725.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29126213592 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93394395767 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541747572816 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 835.2 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3138471027 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.9655172414 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7586206897 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8275862069 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 25.0 11.8709677419 211% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162283183824 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475154118423 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340188417791 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983616239838 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323727528099 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.