Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No, one can deny that there are both positive and negative influence of using technology. if I forced myself to choose, I adamantly believe that students utilizing their phones have a dangerous consequence for health and educational perspectives.
First of all, the younger generations should not be permitted to own cell phones because they may have a negative influence on their well-being. Electromagnetic radiation can trigger developmental disorders because their brains are still in a formative phase at this stage. In fact, adverse health conditions can emerge from constant exposure to harmful radioactive waves, which include a higher levels of learning disabilities such as ADHD, tumors, and evened cancer since their cognitive abilities are affected. For example, three years ago, I used to work on my personal computers for extended hours, and as a result, I complained from severely headache that affect my quality of life. Furthermore, being in front of a tiny screen for longer period can cause major vision issues because they may strain their eyes gazing at images presented. consequently, in order to ensure that children have optimal welfare, they should not be allowed to have devices like smart phones.
In addition, kids should not have access to cellular phones due to the implications they may have on their educational careers. Indeed, such gadgets can be tremendously distraction if brought to school because they will most likely be tempted to employ them at inappropriate times. Along with, rather than paying attention and focusing to a teacher's valuable lessons, they will opt to play video games or utilize social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram because they are readily available. this would create a toxic atmosphere not conductive for knowledge acquisitions because it would provoke their peers to imitate their destructive behaviors. Therefore, parents should limit their offspring spending a long time on phones, so they increase kid's career opportunity for the future job.
Finally, childhood is when our minds are the most malleable because we have a flexible ability to think and explore. our capability to memorize different things as a result our brains are still in a formative stage, so kids should not utilize their electronic device. For instance, kids can absorb information quickly because their brains like sponges, so they are more receptive to learning different skills. As a result, obtaining broader education would have positive impact to enhance their academic performance.
In conclusion, I encourage all parents to limit their kids explode technology for all the reasons stated above. Hopefully, more of my peers will value my opinion in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-01 | aaronahmed | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | anman | 87 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | anman | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
No, one can deny that there are both pos...
^^^^
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...negative influence of using technology. if I forced myself to choose, I adamantly ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r health and educational perspectives. First of all, the younger generations sh...
^^^^
Line 2, column 849, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
... their eyes gazing at images presented. consequently, in order to ensure that children have ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wed to have devices like smart phones. In addition, kids should not have access...
^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a teacher' or simply 'teachers'?
Suggestion: a teacher; teachers
...r than paying attention and focusing to a teachers valuable lessons, they will opt to play...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ram because they are readily available. this would create a toxic atmosphere not con...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...career opportunity for the future job. Finally, childhood is when our minds are...
^^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Our
... flexible ability to think and explore. our capability to memorize different things...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to enhance their academic performance. In conclusion, I encourage all parents t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2311.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38694638695 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8270743766 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592074592075 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6956816401 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.631578947 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5789473684 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36842105263 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0606852673458 0.236089414692 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.020704061695 0.076458572812 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0228668251145 0.0737576698707 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0360294487103 0.150856017488 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183848683454 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.01818996416 126% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 86.8835125448 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.