Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Technological development played triggering role of penetrating technologies to all aspects of people lives. Life definitely changed over a few decades, but people do not become lack of creativity. Thus, I strongly believe that technology helps children increase their creativity than before. In the following paragraphs I will try to explain why I think like this.
First of all, creativity is the way of turning new and imaginative ideas into reality. If in the past people use wooden material for creating new things, now people use technologies to achieving the result that they want. In essence, my younger brother likes to play video games, so he always searching for new stuff for his ideas, Recently, after finishing all quests in one game he found a method how to create new quests and new characters. Then he started to play his own creating quests, which were really interesting. And this is a only one example how people turn their imagination into reality using only technologies.
Second, creativity is to perceive the world in new ways, to find hidden patterns and create connection between them. Some people may think that technologies made life easier and people do not force their brains to work, but in my opinion, if people do not use their brains how they create this technologies and production to make our lives easier. Every year thousands of new products are made using only imagination and creativity and it is, of course, due to technologies. For example, my friend’s daughter, she is only four years old, is making her favorite cartoons characters with legos, no one teach her how to do that, she just saw on TV how people construct new thing with materials that they have. She uses her imagination to bring her ideas a life.
Third, technologies help people to economize time, people now do not need to waste time on washing, cleaning and other stuff. Therefore, they have more free time to use it on things that attracting or interesting for them. Sure, children become more interested in technologies. When I was a child, I always wanted to know how everything worked, so when something was broken I separated it into pieces and started to look what are there. If there were pieces that may work, I remove them, and then use them to create new things.
To sum up the points mentioned above, technologies do not affect on children’s creativity badly. They become more creative and they have a greater chances to develop their creativeness than in the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Tharwat | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | star435 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Isioma Nwayor | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 536, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ch were really interesting. And this is a only one example how people turn their ...
^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...do not use their brains how they create this technologies and production to make our...
^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ts mentioned above, technologies do not affect on children's creativity badly. They ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...op their creativeness than in the past.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, really, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, for example, i think, of course, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91725768322 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78895693236 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543735224586 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5716264341 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0476190476 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04761904762 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169426815619 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567818149817 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489914746854 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119068909187 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651691559561 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.