Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

In the past few decades, with the development of technology, televisions and social media have played a substantial role in the community. It has become a new trend where the company can showcase its products through television advertisements, and in return, the company is making a lot of profit from customers. In this regard, some people think that television advertisements should not target young children in marketing their products. While others hold a different opinion that it is the parent’s responsibility to hold control of the child’s activity, and there should be no restriction to show advertisements on television. From my perspective, the former view contains more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that children’s physical health might be compromised after watching a few advertisements. It is fact that when the advertisement is designed to aim at children, the editor will put some fictional stories in order to make it more attractive to children such as a man is flying like a superman, and a child can defeat his enemy by using a sword. Moreover, children at this age do not have the ability to distinguish between right and wrong, and they would try to imitate those features blindly what they see on television. Consequently, they could hurt themselves by trying such harmful activities. To elaborate this more, last week, one child tried to jump from a building since he thought after having milk, he would be like a superman. And he severely injured because of his silly act after watching an advertisement on television. Therefore, child protection is a paramount factor that should not be compromised at any level.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in my mind is that child’s mental health also would be badly affected by adapting various inappropriate contexts through television advertisements. Even though Advertisement companies claim that their advertisements contain valuable information for the younger ones, but the reality is different, and they like to show only imaginary false information whereby children get easily attracted to buy their products. Since the children easily adapt new information at this age and would continue believing that as truth for whole life which may prove very dangerous for their mental growth. Consequently, sometimes children may have to face negative consequences in the future as they actually do not aware of reality and live in their own imaginary world.
Lastly, having discussed the issue from this point of view, I rather look at it from another standpoint. Admittedly, it is clearly visible that children do not get benefited much through television advertisements, although it could have some positive sides as well. To shade more light on this, many advertisements contain valuable information for children. It gives a good impact on their overall behavior which would have not possible if they would try learning it from somewhere else. Hence, the government should imply such rules where companies, as well as children, both get benefited through broadcasting such advertisements on television.
All in all, contemplating all remarks, I strongly believe that the government should ban advertisements which contain harmful characteristics for the children. This is because advertising strategies aimed at children have many negative effects on children’s minds as well as physical health.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, lastly, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2932.0 1977.66487455 148% => OK
No of words: 547.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36014625229 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12050230459 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524680073126 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 895.5 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8852734138 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.166666667 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7916666667 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170845631463 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517160598704 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034134213727 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104417486585 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205308144305 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.