Everybody today spends some part of their day watching television. It seems that the time that could have been spent with family and friends is taken up by TV soaps. However I do not believe that television has destroyed communication among friends and family.
Television is something we enjoy watching together as a family and it gives us a topic to discuss about. Many good shows are aired in the evening when the husband and wife have returned home from work and they can watch it together with their children. I remember watching a show with my family that aired on comedy central at 9 in the evening. At times when there were cliff hanger episodes, we used to think about all the possible outcomes that it could have. It infact was a hot topic of discussion, where everybody participated, as we all had the same information. After show or during the commercials, we use to enjoy thinking and taking about the twists and turns that the writer could have envisioned. So instead of destroying the communication, television encouraged it.
When television airs news about natural calamity in some part of the world, we are instantly reminded and concerned about our friends who live there. Recently, when there were torrential rains in the northern parts of India, the news report showed how people were standed in their own homes without food and electricity. On watching this, we instantly tried to communiacte with our friends who lived there. Luckily, their place was not severely affected. We asked them to be prepared and cautious. It made us feel closer inspite of the distance. Hence, the news on television, made us concerned about our friends and in some way was responsible for our communication.
Therefore, television has not destroyed our communication, although it may have altered it. We might be talking about different issues now after the advent of this technology, but there is no change in our inclination to express and hear.
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 66
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in mon 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc."A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks ar 58
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ly and friends is taken up by TV soaps. However I do not believe that television has de...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 611, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...fter show or during the commercials, we use to enjoy thinking and taking about the ...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'talking about']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.211538461538 0.229887763892 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.192307692308 0.158761421928 121% => OK
Adjectives: 0.043956043956 0.0866891130778 51% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0521978021978 0.046263068375 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0961538461538 0.0685040099705 140% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.118131868132 0.118717715034 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0549450549451 0.0351676179071 156% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74783661461 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0164835164835 0.0309702414327 53% => OK
Particles: 0.00274725274725 0.00188951952338 145% => OK
Determiners: 0.0769230769231 0.0887237588012 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0164835164835 0.0209618222197 79% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0274725274725 0.0139019557991 198% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1956.0 2387.08602151 82% => OK
No of words: 330.0 408.028673835 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92727272727 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48200974243 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.318181818182 0.338922669872 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.242424242424 0.251872472559 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.181818181818 0.174417080927 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.124242424242 0.112833075102 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74783661461 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.524397521467 109% => OK
Word variations: 62.624524924 59.2087087015 106% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.3684210526 20.5533526081 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5489843203 48.84282405 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.947368421 120.699889404 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3684210526 20.5533526081 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.421052631579 0.644075263715 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 41.6108452951 45.7405998639 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.12903225806 1.45489161554 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278198597553 0.300154397459 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0890762377253 0.103427244359 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0674816379663 0.0752933317313 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.461362979772 0.497263757937 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.14621232038 0.151897553556 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105775058066 0.114077575197 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793197723152 0.0781384742642 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.319804180891 0.336927656856 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0364617556472 0.067059652881 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196984716169 0.210909579961 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541360096905 0.0618886996521 87% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 8.42114695341 59% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 13.6433691756 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.