Has TV destroyed communication?
During last two decades, TV has dramatically spread into every family. Even if adults or children loved to watch TV due to its capability of being suitable for every stage of age by its various various channels. At the same time it comes with several social issues. These issues specially have been revealed in reducing communication among us.
specialized channels are attracting more and more people. Those nonstop contents rising the number of audiences who watch TV by spending their all free time. Recently local TV station sets an animation channels which is playing nonstop animation and TV shows for hole day for children. This was a great event for my six year old nephew. He loved watching Disney animations thus appealed by the channel so much so that he started to watch TV from early morning to evening. Even some times he would delay having lunch just for finishing one of the episodes. At the same time, there is also a sports channel which makes love it. Once I arrived home first thing to do is go into my bedroom and switch on my little TV to watch my favorite football match which is broadcasted on this channel. Since that most of my time for communicating with my family is spend for TV.
TV can provide a low cost entertaining for people who wants to enjoy theirs weekend or holiday. It isn’t hard to imagine that watching a high definition movie on a 56 inch big screen then having some snacks and a bottle of cola while watching the movie will give one quite good funning experience. Hence there could be no need to go for out door activities which could cost more money. This specialty of TV also attracting people to spent their time on TV instead of make communication with their family or friends.
To sum up, although TV has brought us lots of convenience and valueble informations for our lives, we should not neglect its nagitive aspact, especialy the destroying the cummunication.
- TPO 54 Integrated Writing 3
- There is a disagreement on the impact of increased business and culture contact between countries on a country’s identity. What is your opinion? 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng last two decades, TV has dramatically spread into every family. Even if adults...
^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: various
... suitable for every stage of age by its various various channels. At the same time it comes wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...led in reducing communication among us. specialized channels are attracting more...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Specialized
...n reducing communication among us. specialized channels are attracting more and more p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 853, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...ime for communicating with my family is spend for TV. TV can provide a low cost en...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cating with my family is spend for TV. TV can provide a low cost entertaining f...
^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...give one quite good funning experience. Hence there could be no need to go for out do...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cialy the destroying the cummunication.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'while', 'even so', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260869565217 0.229887763892 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.165760869565 0.158761421928 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0869565217391 0.0866891130778 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0461956521739 0.046263068375 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0625 0.0685040099705 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122282608696 0.118717715034 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0679347826087 0.0351676179071 193% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.63548285826 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0298913043478 0.0309702414327 97% => OK
Particles: 0.0054347826087 0.00188951952338 288% => OK
Determiners: 0.0733695652174 0.0887237588012 83% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0163043478261 0.0209618222197 78% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0163043478261 0.0139019557991 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1965.0 2387.08602151 82% => OK
No of words: 340.0 408.028673835 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77941176471 5.86048508987 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48200974243 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.302941176471 0.338922669872 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.232352941176 0.251872472559 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.158823529412 0.174417080927 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0911764705882 0.112833075102 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63548285826 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638235294118 0.524397521467 122% => OK
Word variations: 78.5420241139 59.2087087015 133% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.8947368421 20.5533526081 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7890888623 48.84282405 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.421052632 120.699889404 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8947368421 20.5533526081 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.526315789474 0.644075263715 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.54480286738 144% => OK
Readability: 41.1300309598 45.7405998639 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.64356435644 1.45489161554 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172273878726 0.300154397459 57% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0666835252182 0.103427244359 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0716736584434 0.0752933317313 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.450026584349 0.497263757937 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.215952354831 0.151897553556 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612994667859 0.114077575197 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415135978473 0.0781384742642 53% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.203552969777 0.336927656856 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0644046329446 0.067059652881 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128349171467 0.210909579961 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301675636293 0.0618886996521 49% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.42114695341 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.6433691756 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.