Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Although it is generally believed that the world has changed significantly during the last decades, the question remains how we are supposed to react to those changes. In this respect, some people think that we should be more dynamic and take risk to succeed. Meanwhile, many others argue that the alterations in life should not affect our behavior. Personally, I am prone to believe that we do need to hurry in our work and risk making errors. I hold this opinion for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, we should remember that our decisions may influence our colleagues and friends, too. We all have colleagues who work hard and do their best to achieve something in their professional life. While making risky decisions, we should be aware of the possible effects of our decisions for our co-workers. For example, if our decision may cause bankruptcy of the company where we work, we should not take that kind of decisions, not to danger the career of our colleagues.
Also, we should take into consideration the fact that our risky decisions may have negative impact on our families. In our world, our family members, especially kids depend on us financially. So, possible lost of the source of income in the family as a result of our unwise actions would harm them. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Several years ago I was heading a company producing technological devices. Due to to some not thoughtful decisions my firm was announced bankrupt. This fact worsened the financial conditions of my family seriously, so as we had to replace our kids from private school to a public one.
To sum up briefly, the changing world should not make us unwise and acting unthoughtfully. Its explanation is twofold: first, we may harm our colleagues, and, second, our wrong decisions may influence negatively our families.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
- Written paragraph:In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is toassemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offersseveral advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider rang 80
- The reading passage suggests that the mentioned explorer indeed reached the Noth Pole in 1909. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that Peary's assertions are false. 76
- This material addresses the question of whether ethanol fuel is a good alternative to gasoline in the Northern America. The reading passage suggests that the disadvantages of ethanol fuel outweigh its advantages. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes t 78
- Life is easier and more comfortable than it was when our grandparents were children. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively that they are asked to work alone on projects. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...ny producing technological devices. Due to to some not thoughtful decisions my firm w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, first, if, may, second, so, while, for example, kind of, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90880503145 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79439454561 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572327044025 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5131523959 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7222222222 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.086021208031 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354084999032 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043780232459 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636575808359 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030825227025 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.