do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
in twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than they are today.
use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
In today’s modern world, vehicles have crucial importance in every society. Also, they have a great influence on people’s lives. However, many people use their cars in daily activities, some utilize public transportations. With this in mind, there are opposing viewpoints about the future of cars. While some believe that as technology advances, the demand for using cars will rise, others believe otherwise. As far as I am concerned, in the future, the current popularity of cars will be replaced with efficient public transportation. The reasons why I believe so are manifold, among which the matter of convenience, environment, and economy dominate.
First of all, Using public transportation is much more convenient and safe. I mean, driving is an exhausting and dangerous activity. Nowadays, streets are replete with inexperienced drivers, since many People usually attend to driving as soon as they get their licenses. Sometimes, these newly learned drivers, make the streets a very dangerous place for everyone, and if other drivers would not be careful, they will be in trouble. On the other hand, bus and train drivers are usually very competent and experienced. Besides, driving needs too much attention. For instance, when people use their car, they should be very careful and prudent, but when they use public transportation, they can rest or even sleep until they get to their destinations. Furthermore, by the widespread use of public transportation, the traffic will be better, and therefore, less time will be wasted in traffic every day.
Second, nowadays, the air of the big cities is polluted. Many major cities, such as Tehran, Beijing, Dehli, and so forth, are inhospitable thanks to Massive use of automobiles, and if this tendency toward using cars would not decline, people will face horrible situations. However, public vehicles pollute the air too, in comparison to the people they can serve, they are very beneficial. For example, buses can carry thirty people at a time, but if these people use their vehicles, they will need thirty cars. One bus is less pollutive than thirty vehicles.
Last but not least, public transportation can help the economy of not only the individuals but also the government. Owning an automobile causes some extra expenses such as taxes, parking bills, repairs, and insurance money, to name but a few. Also, the value of the car will decrease every year. But, by using public transportation, people can save much of that money. Furthermore, governments will not be obliged to spend an enormous amount of money on buying or exploring oil. Moreover, as a result of decreasing the traffic and pollution in the air, people will be much healthier, thus, the government spends less money on treating people.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, I strongly believe that in twenty years there will be fewer cars than today because people seek more convenience every day. Also, the environment will not tolerate this increasing rate of pollution anymore, and the governments and people can save more money. I think some developed countries have already tried to reduce the number of cars.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 58
- p 3
- TPO 54 The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake The level of salt in the lake 039 s water what scientists call its salinity has been increasing steadily for years because the lake 039 s water is evaporating faster than it is be 75
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sch 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i mean, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2647.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 511.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18003913894 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82156629582 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516634050881 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 828.0 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5702961183 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.275862069 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6206896552 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27586206897 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252982345788 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064383429191 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057334810971 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151024899877 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331090578072 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.