Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character.
It goes without saying that there have been always different ways within human being’s reach to exactly discern the personality of people and they have increased in an unprecedented way since the human’s recognition has come a long way. While many parochial people may not concede, I strongly subscribe to the view that the way how people dress thoroughly speaks of their character and they go together. The reasons to substantiate the view I asserted are elaborated upon the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, since the identity of every individual consists of his personal idiosyncrasies, tenet, preoccupation and temperament, and all of them propel people to synchronize their daily activities, in particular, the way they dress, with the mentioned factors, the dressing way is a proper symptom of everyone’s character. In other words, not only does the people’s disposition result in people dressing according to the certain way they think or assess their environments, but they also are conspicuously inclined to exhibit their own thoughts to their fellowmen by this way. To be more specific, from the psychological perspective, humans, thanks to their observation capability, often evaluate and judge whoever they meet for the first time, just by glancing through him and make a decision about his demeanor in the twinkling of an eye. Thus, meticulously apprehending this prominent issue which is so influential throughout their life people do their best to wear the clothing which is explicitly compatible with their notions just to be recognized by others appropriately. In this way, others do not misinterpret their personality and commit a misconception, which may engender additional endeavors in the future to amend their attitude. Furthermore, since in almost all of the developed countries in the modern era every individual is utterly entitled to dress in the way he prefers and there is no limitation against him to hamper his personal approach, people, as a rule, dress in a way that comforts to their personal beliefs. Accordingly, Iranians’ famous proverb, “Whatever protrudes from a clay jug completely indicates what is actually inside it.” is a case in point, which means the way people act and dress specifies their own identity.
Second, since from the psychological perspective, the way how a person dresses whether he is conscious or not, dramatically affects his behaviors, in the long run, his clothing is entirely a proper hallmark for others to distinguish his personality. Actually, the psychiatrists believe that the diverse spectrum of colors and patterns of what people wear will absolutely change their temperament in the long term. For instance, with respect to the beneficial results of considerable research done by the elite scholars, there is a widespread consensus that the people, wearing the dark color clothes may encounter with a great number of mental disorders and this can make them so despondent or the red clothing, which is associated with energy, can motivate them in order to put a lot of energy on their assigned tasks. Moreover, dressing in a particular way, inspired from someone who has made a name for himself in a certain issue, people will start to imitate the route of their livelihood too, maybe either to acquire a better dignity between their counterparts or to achieve the prosperity. Consequently, doing these activities associated with a certain clothing method over and over causes them to get accustomed to their paradigm’s disposition, which will obviously alter their character even if they are not aware of what they de facto do.
In conclusion, taking all of the aforementioned grounds into account, I daresay that there is a strong interconnection between the people’s identity and what they dress and each has a lot of momentous impacts on and shapes the other. Hence, considering the clothes of someone, others can completely recognize his personality.
- In order to well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character. 75
- It is more important for the governments to spend money to improve internet access than to improve public transportation. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unprecedented way" with adverb for "unprecedented"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ality of people and they have increased in an unprecedented way since the human's recognition has ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1293, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... attitude. Furthermore, since in almost all of the developed countries in the modern era e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1788, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and dress specifies their own identity. Second, since from the psychological per...
^^^^
Line 7, column 23, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...y de facto do. In conclusion, taking all of the aforementioned grounds into account, I ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, in other words, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 94.0 52.1666666667 180% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3363.0 1977.66487455 170% => OK
No of words: 629.0 407.700716846 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34658187599 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00798087137 4.48103885553 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16843889915 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 332.0 212.727598566 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527821939587 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 1036.8 618.680645161 168% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.1344086022 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.3083074091 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 197.823529412 100.406767564 197% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 20.6045352989 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4117647059 5.45110844103 209% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236742791647 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867416488861 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554284937546 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145221102576 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539911659764 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.3 11.7677419355 190% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 58.1214874552 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.1575268817 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.01818996416 126% => OK
difficult_words: 185.0 86.8835125448 213% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.0537634409 167% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.