Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Communication between coworkers is significant in any project because adequate relationship and comprehension will lead to satisfactory result. Personally, I believe that sharing information by e-mail may lead to better accomplishment. I feel this way for three main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, there are several introvert individuals including me in some organizations. However, workers work together irrespective of whether they are shy. Therefore, timid people are also required to share their opinion and knowledge, which signifies that they might be unable to express the opinion and feeling while talking in person. On the other hand, they will include every necessary information while utilizing e-mail because they will not be shy while using computer or electronic device. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Few years ago, I worked with three colleagues all of whom are extrovert, which is the reason why we were mainly discussing in person. Unfortunately, I could not tell them large extent of significant information because of personal problem, being timid. Hence, our group project was of low quality because I could not include enough detail to the job. Drawing from my own experience, people can include necessary information and expression regardless of their personal ability to communicate with other people.
Secondly, Accuracy and detail of work information is crucial in every job, especially in white-collar projects. People regard and revise things while writing document or mail but not while speaking. In other words, individuals can provide comprehensive and accurate datas to their e-mail by pondering. By contrast, some people tend to forget including some information while speaking. In conclusion, If people communicate with their co-workers on virtual platform, the project will be well-founded and definitive because they will be capable of mentioning key details.
Finally, some people forget what others stated while working as group, and begin performing inadequate matters in light of knowledge that they are incompletely recalling. Fortunately, individuals can solve this problem easily by writing e-mail to each other because people can check the instruction on e-mail whenever they need it. Hence, they can include every details on their job without missing something. To illustrate this, I would like to provide my experience on office. Few months ago, in the group meeting, my co-workers contrived the plan of work, and assigned portions of project by discussing in person. Unfortunately, my friend who work with me had accomplished wrong task because he did not remember discussion accurately, which is the reason our group project was disturbed and prolonged for a week.
In summation, I am of the opinion of colleagues should share their opinion and data in order to achieve satisfactory outcome. This is because introverts can express their opinion, information will be fixed, last but not least, every workers will be able to see instructions again if they forget it.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people succeed it is entirely because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with their success Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 76
- TPO 23 78
- TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader 71
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare Has this change improved the way people live 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to study art and literature than it is to study math and science Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, i feel, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2622.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49685534591 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00265709251 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526205450734 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 822.6 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9767934324 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.88 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.08 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211211484302 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603020435252 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407214543397 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129637963148 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369276893544 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.