Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When people solve problems as a group, they come up with better solutions that if they were to try to solve the problem individually. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of working in a group. If I were asked to choose, I would definitely prefer to work on problems in a group rather than working alone. I firmly believe this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, working in group brings different perspectives to conquer a problem from each individual which leads to a better solution. When people work in group and discuss about a problem they come up with different ideas as everyone has different acumen, through process and vision to approach a problem. These different perspective leads to number of solutions and it gives different options for a team to choose from. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced from my personal experience. Five years ago, I was working as a sales analyst in a multinational company. I have been tasked to work on an idea to attract more companies to buy our products which could lead to increase in company’s profits. I was trying to reach different mid-size and large size companies thinking of that our products can only be afforded by them. However, every time I tried reaching them for talking about our products I came empty handed and my sales goals were not reaching anywhere. As a result, I approached my manager with this and was suggested that I should try calling small size companies as our product will better fit in their eco-system. Surprising, when I started talking with small size companies as suggested by manger, I was able to reach to my goal within 20 days. This clearly depicts that when people work in group they get better ideas to solve a problem.
Secondly, when people work in groups to solve a problem they get to a solution earlier than working individually. With more coming as part of group discussion to conquer a problem, it becomes easy and fast to reach a solution. Drawing from own experience, when I was working on building a website for my company, I reached a point where I was not able to load a webpage. Although I used best tools to resolve the issue, but I was not able to get to roots of it. However, when I called a team meeting and showed my code to different colleagues, they were quick to point out the flaw in my code. Moreover, they were able to posit few more suggestions which enabled my webpage to load faster. This indicates that having different minds to work on a problem can help to reach a solution in much quicker time.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that it is beneficial to work on solving problems in a group. This is because working in groups leads to better solutions, and because it provide quicker solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-05-09 | wnitesh | 70 | view |
| 2019-05-09 | Anu03 | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | Anu03 | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 174, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...ads to better solutions, and because it provide quicker solutions.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, in conclusion, talking about, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64730290456 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65384407606 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479253112033 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.0557795405 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.3913043478 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9565217391 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91304347826 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246909212262 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846841978585 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905862789402 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153304733785 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617049865459 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.