Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Considering one's conditions to measure his ability of teaching others, as far as i'm concerned, the person's work experience is the key element. this person's education and previous job's quality do reflect this one's personal capability.However, in order to fulfill the target of teaching others, working experiences are more significant compared with the other two options. i will elaborate my idea in the following discussion.
The first and most engrossing reason is that teaching process requires a variety of quality, which involves patience and will power and so on. those virtues could only be revealed through one's prior working experience. the one who has a high academic degree or has been equipped with brilliant working position is a solid proof of this man's ability. However, it does not mean that this man will be a good teacher. As a matter of fact, numerous talented people do not have much patience to instruct others. Just imagine that, if this man could not be patient enough to teacher others, so his class will always be obscure, which means the teaching is a total failure. In my opinion, inferred from this person's work experience, an expert human resource executive will know whether this man would satisfy the needs of a good instructor.
Another significant factor regarding this issue is that the person who teaches others to do a job must have been familiar with the type of job. if he knows little about this position, how could he instruct others? Therefore, checking this man's previous working experiences is vital during the selection. Taking my own experiences as an example, I have applied a job which features teaching junior student mathematics. In the job description, the most important requirement is that the applicant must have the math knowledge background and teaching experiences.
Given what has been discussed above, the conclusion can be drawn that when select the one who teaches other to do a job, working experience plays the most important role with respect to the quality a good teacher should be equipped with and the job's relative knowledge background.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
Considering ones conditions to measure his ability of te...
^^^^
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ons work experience is the key element. this persons education and previous jobs qua...
^^^^
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ork experience is the key element. this persons education and previous jobs quality do ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...on and previous jobs quality do reflect this ones personal capability.However, in or...
^^^^
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...o reflect this ones personal capability.However, in order to fulfill the target of teac...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: I
...nt compared with the other two options. i will elaborate my idea in the following...
^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...nt compared with the other two options. i will elaborate my idea in the following...
^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... through ones prior working experience. the one who has a high academic degree or h...
^^^
Line 3, column 696, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...l failure. In my opinion, inferred from this persons work experience, an expert huma...
^^^^
Line 8, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ave been familiar with the type of job. if he knows little about this position, ho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, as a matter of fact, in my opinion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1387283237 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78431572322 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557803468208 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7904116332 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.125 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0877164809213 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320055013232 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036091289381 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642932417982 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177874262499 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.