A commonly held belief is that young people have no impact on the crucial decisions on the society these days. Since more and more young people are becoming less aware of practical matter, however, I personally think that young human beings are still playing an important role in our practical and political life because of their potential and innovation.
To begin with, young people are having influence on the important decisions today because they’re keeping track of the society on many different platforms. There’re different types of ways that young people can get to know what is happening around them. For example, every-day-news can be transferred to teenagers through the network and news channels, teenagers can learn what’s going on in the world recently even without getting away from their beds. In addition, a large number of social apps allow teenagers to chat about political topics with their friends online. Therefore, young people still play an important role in making vital decisions.
Besides, because of the schools, teachers, parents and people who encourage young man to participate in social lives, teenagers are being motivated to determine the future of society. Young people are being more and more active in acquiring for the same clear rights as adults and how to distinguish true from falsehood. For example, our school has set up Model United Nations Club for those students who are interested in protecting the surrounding environment, members of this club have a chance to persuade government officials to make the critical decisions. So that’s why young people still have an impact on making important decisions.
Moreover, although there are not many young people helping the governments make decisions or determine the future, but in some day, young people will become older, then it’s obviously that these people will become a major part of the society. For instance, ripe government officials and presidents have both grown up through adolescence, hence young people of present will finally become a part of the decider of the society one day. That’s why they’re having influences on judging the future of society.
In short, those are the reasons why I think today’s young people are more engaged with critical decision making, not only because of young people’s potentials, but also the connection and information percolation.
- Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has Technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 56
- some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to teach this 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...they’re keeping track of the society on many different platforms. There’re different types of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 468, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ting away from their beds. In addition, a large number of social apps allow teenagers to chat abo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in short, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31052631579 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65369000396 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534210526316 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0780920898 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.533333333 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 5.45110844103 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252041182009 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10307904406 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706141222607 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156902547514 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213703526013 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.