The zoo is a concept of learning the way of wildlife. There are two sides of maintaining a wildlife park. Some people find it no use of human life. On the other hand, others believe it as essential for our lives as well as for the wild animal.
In case of Sufferi Park, as per my point of view we can gather huge knowledge of animals which can provide a better life for the beasts and birds. Moreover, researchers can observe the animal life closely form a shelter. The whole observation has a great impact on wildlife. It is somehow difficult to fetch the threats, problems and solutions of the animal if there is no zoo at all.Furthermore,sanctuary of birds and animals a huge source of entertainment especially for the children. Kids love to visit zoological park crazily.
On the other hand, animal born for their lives. There is no point of kept a creature for our own demand. The life of a forest and a zoo are not similar. It is not possible to help a bird which is flying fearlessly by the experience of a bird living in a cage. After all, tamed creatures and jungle life belong a different behavior. Last but not least, the way the animal kept is brutality somehow. Perhaps, if we believe in humanity, we have no rights to keep any life to a cage. Meanwhile, animal protection groups are very active on it.
In fine, closing a zoo is neither possible nor desirable for the sake of learning ecology. It is not that difficult to improve the lifestyle of zoo for its dwellers. We should not do anything which is harmful for the animal.
- There is a public event coming up in your town Write a letter to your friend who you think would be interested to take part in it In your letter Describe the event Say why you think he she would be interested Suggest an arrangement to meet there with him 100
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A zoo has no useful purpose Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer 55
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 56
- Some people say that educational success most of the time depends on having a good teacher Others say that student attitudes also do matters Discuss both views and give your opinion 54
- In some areas in the US a curfew is imposed in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult What is your opinion about this 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...of the animal if there is no zoo at all.Furthermore,sanctuary of birds and animals a huge s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , sanctuary
...al if there is no zoo at all.Furthermore,sanctuary of birds and animals a huge source of e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ything which is harmful for the animal.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, after all, as for, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 1977.66487455 64% => OK
No of words: 282.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50709219858 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80196825559 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535460992908 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6818283349 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.55 100.406767564 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1 20.6045352989 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0730729841663 0.236089414692 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025389694053 0.076458572812 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359481247817 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0528133747703 0.150856017488 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240741651212 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 11.7677419355 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.29 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.