Honesty in a relationship has been admired for years. In an overall scenario, I think everyone like to hear truth around them but when told, reactions can devastating. Many believe that telling truth always improves your relations with people, but I am skeptical about this theory. Often, we treat people with our own perception of their personality, and based on this we create assumption about their behaviors which may or may not be their real behaviors. I believe that telling truth has a lot to do with circumstances we face every day, with all types of people. I do not completely agree with this idea that telling truth is the most important consideration in a relationship.
Honesty is generally appreciated in relationships between husband and wife, Mother and her child, where we are a part of one family tree and dependant on each other for our daily needs. Those relationships which are outside the family tree does not need to know the truth all the time or in another word, it is not advisable, to tell the truth in certain circumstances, for example, a relationship between a patient and a doctor. Imagine if a doctor tells his patient directly about the severity of their health without concealing it with supportive words, this version of truth might be very hard for a person to digest and it can impact their health further with anxiety, nervousness or in some cases mental issues.
The other reason, I think that telling the truth every time can be disastrous in an employer-employee relationship. An employer has to be very encouraging and supportive to get best from their employees, even if they do not perform their best on some occasions. Imagine, while rating employees during appraisal time, an employer sometimes rate their employees little higher to motivate them and keep them with their current job. In this case, if an employer directly informs the employee about their bad performance but still rating them high just to keep them motivated then, an employee might feel rejected. So the whole theory to keep things transparent between employer and employee might be no use.
I would like to conclude this essay with my support for honesty overall in relationships but with an additional thought that it might not be the best, to tell the truth in all scenarios.
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading.In 1939, David O Selznick produced a film of Margaret Mitchell’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel, Gone with the Wind. The movie proved to 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- The emperor Claudius of Rome ruled an empire spanning three continents between 41 and 54 CE. His reign was of massive importance to the history of ancient European civilization. In fact, the emperor was among the most innovative, fair, and wise in all Rom 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in relationship between people. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...re we are a part of one family tree and dependant on each other for our daily needs. Thos...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, then, while, as to, for example, i think, in some cases, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92544987147 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80847358419 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516709511568 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5268789152 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.733333333 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9333333333 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258596646731 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111399962271 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12116791019 0.0737576698707 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171378775312 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961369614205 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.