Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Companies should pay for employees to get a university degree.
It is undeniable that employee’s academic grade and level of education have a significant influence on companies’ performance. Although some people are of the opinion that it is not duties of companies to pay for employees to get a university degree, I support a contradictory view. As far as I am concerned, companies, in order to improve employees' knowledge, must prepare an easy condition for them. There are numerous reasons for this view, two of which – that is – employees poor economic condition, and increasing performance of companies are the most outstanding ones elaborated hereunder.
To begin with, the most striking reason why I believe the companies should help their employees to get a university degree is the fact that in the most companies employees’ economic condition is not very good, so they cannot pay for studying in university. For example, I remember one of my friends was very keen to resume his study and get a university degree. But he worked full time in a company and did not have enough time to participate in university. Furthermore, tuition of the university was so expensive and he could not supply this money. Eventually, the company that he works in, prepare a good condition for competent employees to participate in university. Now he is one of the sophisticated managers of that company and has a lot of benefits for them.
Another equally important point is that companies by paying for employees studying not only increase their knowledge, but also improve companies’ performance. Because when employees participate in university they studying in many major and meet updated information about their work. As a result, they can use this information in the company and improves the performance of the company. For instance, in my country, petrochemical companies prepare a very good condition for their employees to participate in university at a relative major. These employees after graduation return and improve the performance of the company. Resulting these company are always up to date.
All in all, with all this taken into account, the more educated employees company have, the more progress it can achieve. Therefore, I subscribe to this view that paying for employees studying in the university must be imported in companies’ basic strategies.
- vessels that archaeologist found in iraq 73
- The college years are the best time in a person s life Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Give specific reasons to support your position 80
- If you could make one important change in the educational system of your country, what change would you make? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 73
- Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why? 73
- Some people prefer to spend most of their time alone. Others like to be with friends most of the time. Do you prefer to spend your time alone or with friends? Give reasons to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... get a university degree. But he worked full time in a company and did not have enough ti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 639, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'these companies'?
Suggestion: this company; these companies
...e performance of the company. Resulting these company are always up to date. All in all, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26273458445 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20567656275 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487935656836 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5629800497 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.055555556 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7222222222 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332724109434 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117702357771 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779884580116 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224911043486 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036601274158 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.