Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell-phone, online games, and social networking Web site.
It is an undeniable fact that education plays a pivotal role in almost every child's life. Due to its paramount importance, parents try to provide them with the best possibilities in education, including good schools, knowledgeable teachers, etc. In this regard, some people are the leading proponents of the view that because of the unprecedented growth of technology, and accordingly the excessive usage of children from them, educating children is being more arduous. However, in my opinion, the process of their learning has nothing to do with their usage of technology. I feel this way for two main reason which I will elaborate in the following essay.
First off, nowadays parents can efficaciously take control of their children in the learning process. This idea can be viewed through two different lenses. For one, today poeple are more aware of the science of psychology, a part of which is about children's raising, and they try to effectively utilize it in their own lives. As a result, parents have this powerful means and can better cope with the problems that they might confront during learning and raising their infant child. Secondly, nowadays parents have less children compared to the past. Correspondingly, they have a substantial amount of time that they can spend on educationg their children. Thus, regardless of the time that children may spend using smart gadgets or the Internet, because of these two reasons they can overcome the arduousity of raising their child.
Furthermore, advent of technological devices and tools provided parents and educators a gigantic opportunity that if they are aware of, they can utilise it in the best plausible way. My own experience as a teacher is a compelling example of this. I was teaching physics to children in middle-school last year. Using the material in the internet gave me the chance to elucidate the things that my students have difficulty learning it. For example, they could not imagine how a pondule might work, so I easily showed them a movie about it!
To wrap it up, I strongly believe that educating children is far more easier than it was in the past. Because not only are parents more aware due to the growth of psychology, but also they can utilize the effective means of technology in order to raise and teach them better.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to hold a big party and invite many people to come than a small party where only a few close friends and family members are invited. 100
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All school teachers should be required to take courses every five years to update their knowledge. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell-phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun children is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... child. Secondly, nowadays parents have less children compared to the past. Correspo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
... believe that educating children is far more easier than it was in the past. Because not on...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, i feel, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78207946932 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549222797927 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2964307259 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194536409354 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608294897435 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473410129436 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125275215072 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031766534227 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.