Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, children live better lives than their ancestors did. Personally, I think that it is easier to educate modern kids than it was in the past. There are a few reasons why I hold this stance.
First of all, these days, students do not have to leave school and work full-time jobs like their grandparents did. In many countries, governments financially support families with children, and therefore, there is no need for them to start working from the very young age. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I got my first job after graduation a college since, in my country, the government paid institutions for students` education. Moreover, they paid students for advances grades. In this way, I could focus on a learning process but not on making money for living. On the contrary, my grandfather told me that one of the reasons he was not able to read is because he has to work while a kid for twelve hours a day to survive and did not have time to go to school. The economic situation in the country at that time was terrible. To that end, although contemporary kids devote a lot of time to playing with their devices, teachers have them in class to teach.
Secondly, in the past, some children simply did not have an opportunity to attend a school and gain an education. Kids who lived in remote areas did not have schools nearby or did not have teachers to educate them. For instance, I recall stories from my grandfather, who I mentioned above. He was born and raised in a countryside, and the only school he could go to was far away from his home. Moreover, there was no transportation available. If he had a horse, he would have commuted there, but his family did not have one, and for that reason, he was not capable of attending the facility. Despite the opinion that nowadays children are distracted from their school assignments by cell phones and laptops and as a result do not study hard enough, they go to school regularly and still learn something at least. That is why I believe that educating modern children is not challenging.
To summarize, I strongly believe that it is not difficult to teach millennials. This is because in comparison with our ancestors, they have more free time to study, and more educational facilities available to attend.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A person should never make an important decision alone.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 749, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd as a result do not study hard enough, they go to school regularly and still le...
^^
Line 4, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ational facilities available to attend.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, as to, at least, for instance, i think, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69727047146 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74416333821 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1240888725 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0454545455 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3181818182 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04545454545 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163972935619 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512350905089 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391594639547 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121281842928 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285386385688 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.