Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, people around the world are challenged to achieve the success by the society and themselves, especially success in the professional field. The problem is to recognize what is the best way to pursue your professional goals. However, this topic is something controversial due to it has been called into question many times. I disagree with the idea that is more important enhance our public relationships than study hard at the university for two reasons which I will explain in the following essay.
First and foremost, I think that the best way to achieve our professional success is finding an equilibrium between make new social connections and study hard our courses. That is because none is hugely better than the other since the actual professional recruitment prefers integral professionals. That is mean professionals with "soft" and "hard" abilities and skills. For instance, big companies such as Coca-Cola, Ernest & Young and so on trying to hire professionals with soft and hard skills due to this type of professionals have a mix of tools indispensable to do a perfect job.
Another important reason is that the secret behind the success of the biggest companies is their multidisciplinary human capital. That is mean that corporates require young professionals with years of professional experience, solid academic background, demonstrate soft skills and a mindset willing to learn different field as a social and science knowledge. For example, people with only one type of skills are less probably to be successful in the professional field. For that reason, some people never have the opportunity to take manager and leader position which include better wages.
In sum, while some people advocate the idea of expanding social connections will coming in handy for their accomplishment, the rest of us think that successful professionals should demonstrate soft and hard skills in their diary work.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | DHANDA | 90 | view |
2020-01-13 | naziii | 76 | view |
2020-01-06 | sarah halawani | 65 | view |
2020-01-06 | liviapabreu | 66 | view |
2020-01-05 | Somayya | 76 | view |
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for people to move out of their hometowns when they become adults, instead of staying in their home communities for their whole lives. Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support your 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'come'
Suggestion: come
...ea of expanding social connections will coming in handy for their accomplishment, the ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39672131148 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20266106409 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56393442623 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1124180006 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.615384615 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221974011693 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785655358451 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607897641703 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13936655844 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434271086042 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.