Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
The quality of education plays a vital role in the development of nations. In my opinion, I agree with the statement that the government should spend more money on childhood education than on universities. I feel this way for many potential reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, understanding basic concepts of math and science in the early grades allow children to do better in the later grades. On the other hand, if the child did not get enough training on the essential ideas in each field, they would definitely suffer during the next stages of studying. Furthermore, most realms of knowledge are accumulative in nature. This means doing well on the introductory classes ensures full comprehension of the more advanced ones. My own experience is a compelling example on what I mean. My family hired a private math tutor to help me hone my calculation skills even before I was enrolled in an official school. Whenever I look back, I come to realize more and more how valuable this decision was and how much positive impact it had on my learning future. Having a leg up, I was able to achieve higher grades which further encouraged me to study more and pay attention in classes as it was easier for me to understand. Thus, if the government allocate a larger proportion of the budget to childhood education, this will guarantee a highly competitive and motivated generation of kids.
Secondly, grown-ups are more aware of their decisions and they usually choose a university according to their interest and abilities. Hence, they have incentives to pay some extra money to attend the institution that intrigues them. Besides, most people join university to get credentials to prepare them to practice in a specific career. As a result it's fair that they get charged more as they would be compensated after getting their dream job. Therefore, any government subsidies for higher education would be a waste of money. For instance, in my home country, the government spends huge sums of money on colleges and universities to make it free for everyone. Nevertheless, there is no economic return for the the country as most graduates do not find jobs in the field that they spent years to study. Had the government provided these funds for childhood education which is totally broken, our community would have gotten well-informed adults who would be capable of making better decisions.
In conclusion, I oppose the proposal that the government should offer more support to higher education than to early childhood tutoring. This is mainly due to the fact that youngsters need more attention and care to be prepared for their learning future. On the contrary, adults are fully concious of their choices.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | SSN775 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | SSN775 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | dentista1985 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Armin Azad | 81 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- An international organization has started issuing certifications to wood companies who meet a high ecological standard by conserving resources and recycling materials in an effort to encourage ecological sustainable forestry practices. Certified companies 73
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern- 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- many people believe that greed, or the desire to have more wealth than other people have, is a bad characteristic; people who are greedy are often considered selfish or unkind. However, some people argue that greed is actually a good characteristic for a 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 388, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ult its fair that they get charged more as they would be compensated after getting...
^^
Line 9, column 712, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...heless, there is no economic return for the the country as most graduates do not find j...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 712, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...heless, there is no economic return for the the country as most graduates do not find j...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts are fully concious of their choices.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, hence, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i feel, i mean, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2293.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99564270153 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80516466359 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559912854031 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1632433971 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6956521739 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9565217391 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5652173913 5.45110844103 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258329517 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702519095694 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889211282727 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175294143084 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994243484487 0.0645574589148 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.