Information is everything. Nowadays we consider a person wise and well educated, who has a lot of information. But, it is almost impossible to get real information as people try to manipulate the information in their favor. So, in my opinion, in order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
First of all, the world has become more complex nowadays. Thus, we can not trust all the information we hear. We must hear from different sources. For instance, there are many newspaper or news portal all around the world. Now, we have BBC, CNN, Al Jazira and much other local news media all around the world. They often manipulate the news. I know such a piece of news where Al Jazira broadcast that the prince of Saudi Arab, Mahmud, murdered his one of cousins, Ahmed. When the news spread everywhere and everyone surprised to know that a crown price killed a person. But later on, through the BBC and CNN, I learn that the news is false. The Al Jazira intentionally did this in order to belie about the prince to destroy the reputation of him.
Secondly, it will be unwise to judge any news without confirming it. people spread the news for different reasons. Sometimes, they do this for their political benefits. So, they spread false information to provoke people and gain what they want. For instance, in Bangladesh, 2018, there was a protest ongoing for safety on roads and highways. Students all around the country came to the street to protest for road safety as one of student died in road accident in the capital city Dhaka. The protest was going peacefully. But, after a week, news spread that the government had been killed two students on the street. As a result, the student started violent activities and everyone was scared. But, later on, we learn that the political opponents were intentionally spread that false news to capitalize on their political agenda. If people and student were aware of this matter then, this would not happen.
In conclusion, people should judge any information before believing it.
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Socks, Inc."A recent study of Dura-Socks customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our 38
- integrated task: salvage logging benefits 3
- Independent TOEFL essay - TPO 8: Agree or disagree? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed 66
- agree or disagree: Teachers should not make their political or social views know to students in classroom. 60
- TOEFL integrated writing Chevalier de Seingalt 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...med, a person must get information from many different news resources. First of all, the wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun newspaper seems to be countable; consider using: 'many newspapers'.
Suggestion: many newspapers
...ferent sources. For instance, there are many newspaper or news portal all around the world. No...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'portals'?
Suggestion: portals
...tance, there are many newspaper or news portal all around the world. Now, we have BBC,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87288135593 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62493834561 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528248587571 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7262001372 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.3461538462 100.406767564 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6153846154 20.6045352989 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80769230769 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23425514187 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676851377759 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109429127701 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161987527911 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149255217696 0.0645574589148 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.37 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.