Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources.
As humans living in a civilized society, we are all eager to get aware of our surrounding. There is a list of various news resources which addresses to this fundamental passion. As some people may hold a view that a specific news resource is adequate to cover whole information, others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that the different sources can be accountable. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first reason which gives adherence to my outlook is that the each program possesses the limitation of delivering the whole news. Indeed, each news program in television has a restricted duration to cover complete data; or a magazine or a newspaper own definite quantity of papers to present the information. In this condition, for the sake of the limitation, the program or the newspaper gives the priority toward the most crucial international news rather than the simple local news. Based on this circumstance, an individual, who is eager to inform about specific news, has to refer to various sources to gain the desired information.
The other reason embraced my idea is that the accuracy of the news is suspicious. It is lucidly explicit that the most of the news broadcasting convey the news based on the political or moral principle defined by the government, or the boss. According to the noteworthy, intelligent survey conducted in my country Iran, approximately sixty-nine percent of the news broadcast companies in Iran are administered by the president. As a result, the information depicted by them is partial and do not illustrate the exact facts. In this condition, the lack of impartial, pure information, the person has to check different sources to gain the holistic news and prepares the actual news based on his or her cognitive ability.
The last indicator of my view's accuracy is that the majority of the newspaper and news program are shaped based on the special field. For instance, nowadays, they news sources are categorized based on the field such as the art, science, sport or political, which they cover. In this condition, if the person is willing to know about the two different issues at the same time, he or she has to buy or watch two sources, to be responsible for this demand. A vivid example can be given to shed a light on the subject is my own example, I really interested in the sport; on the other hand, my major is architecture. Hence, I have a subscription to the Iran Sports magazine, which covers the sports events in Iran, and the Memar magazine, which presents the latest information about the architecture. In this situation, I am able to meet my whole demands in the same time.
To wrap it up, based on the all aforementioned in the reasons, one can logically draw the conclusion that the wide range of news sources are required to cover whole information. Since a solo source has the restriction of time or paper to covers whole news, the most of the sources deliver fake or inaccurate data; in addition, the specialist sources cannot be accountable for a person's various attitudes.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 70
- statement 73
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 73
- tpo43 86
- tpo 45-integ 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 869, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...meet my whole demands in the same time. To wrap it up, based on the all aforemen...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 377, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...alist sources cannot be accountable for a persons various attitudes.
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'as to', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'such as', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235880398671 0.229887763892 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.141196013289 0.158761421928 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.107973421927 0.0866891130778 125% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0249169435216 0.046263068375 54% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0398671096346 0.0685040099705 58% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106312292359 0.118717715034 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0332225913621 0.0351676179071 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91149428512 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0382059800664 0.0309702414327 123% => OK
Particles: 0.00166112956811 0.00188951952338 88% => OK
Determiners: 0.147840531561 0.0887237588012 167% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0116279069767 0.0209618222197 55% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0116279069767 0.0139019557991 84% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3195.0 2387.08602151 134% => OK
No of words: 541.0 408.028673835 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90573012939 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.48200974243 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.327171903882 0.338922669872 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266173752311 0.251872472559 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197781885397 0.174417080927 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.144177449168 0.112833075102 128% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91149428512 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489833641405 0.524397521467 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 58.5866866787 59.2087087015 99% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.5909090909 20.5533526081 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4442691764 48.84282405 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.227272727 120.699889404 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5909090909 20.5533526081 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.644075263715 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 51.208284322 45.7405998639 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.82258064516 1.45489161554 125% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315583496875 0.300154397459 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115127509987 0.103427244359 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0633248722951 0.0752933317313 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.598705231406 0.497263757937 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.145851479677 0.151897553556 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145881421717 0.114077575197 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049850976022 0.0781384742642 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.603503506483 0.336927656856 179% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.107230667606 0.067059652881 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243128417203 0.210909579961 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00630019069443 0.0618886996521 10% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.