Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that one of the most important aspects of selecting a job is the ability of a job to lead people into wealth and success. Some people believe that in the past identification of which career would have a bright future was far easier. I, personally, totally agree with this idea and believe that, nowadays, a person who seeking for the job needs to pay more attention to the process of finding a job. In the following paragraphs, I explain my reasons to clarify my viewpoint.
The first reason which comes to my mind is that the progress of technology is changing the future of jobs. In the past, the pace of change was far slower and people could assure that the job they chose, would reach them into the prosperity. Although, in today's modern world, every novel innovشtion could eliminate the need for some particular jobs. I and my father's experience demonstrates convincing evidence of this. My father worked at a company for roughly 30 years. The company was producing some special particle of the automobile and alway had some works to do. After my father retired from his job, I went to the company in exchange for my father. I should have done affairs similarly to my father's, but after a couple of years, the boss fired me due to applying robots instead of humans. This example vividly shows that the progress of technology in this era makes the future of some careers unsecured.
Another reason which deserves being mentioned here is that, nowadays, a great multitude of fields make it strict to predict the future condition of the jobs. Each field could bring a lot of job positions and the future of them is a bit vague. The reason is those creative activities which are performing now, not experienced before and it heightens the chance of their failure. In my country, Iran, most of the recent start-ups are going to drawback and numerous people would lose their job. As a result, these types of innovative ideas will lead to an uncertain future for jobs. Therefore, when people could not have a guarantee in their job, it will be hard for them to stick on it and go toward success on it.
To sum up, based on the aforementioned paragraphs, in this era determining what kind of profession would conduct people into an assured, successful future is more difficult rather than past. Therefore, people should be more aware of the future of the job they want to attend in order to get into success.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- The passage claims that the best colonization option is sending people to an asteroid by pointing out three reasons for support. The lecture, on the other hand, states that it is not a very practical idea and refutes each of the author's reasons. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- The passage claims that governments should dictate high taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy foods by pointing out three reasons for support. Tho lecture, on the other hand, states that this theory can be challenging and refutes each of the author's rea 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to be'.
Suggestion: to be
...ecured. Another reason which deserves being mentioned here is that, nowadays, a gre...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, similarly, so, therefore, kind of, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68065268065 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55216547494 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526806526807 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3044773059 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.619047619 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47619047619 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170543808007 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504044557731 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389339478222 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114544558633 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539081713902 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.