Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today's world, it is important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
While some people may hold the view that in the modern society the quick and mistakable tasks are more crucial; however, some other may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that the accuracy of outcome is a task is more important. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first exquisite reason which gives the adherence to my viewpoint is that the today's tasks are organized and do not bear any error. Indeed, as whole jobs are defined based on the holistic and precise schemes, there is no place for the error. In addition, the majority of risks pave the path to the unmanageable mistakes. Based on the statics released by the University of Tabriz in Iran, nearly sixty percent of risks are ended with the mistakes. In this condition, in a company with its cogent, well-established schedule, there is no requirement for the employees with the potential of mistake. According to another noteworthy, intelligent survey conducted in my country, approximately fifty-nine percent of the bosses have valued the outcomes of the tasks rather than the employees' velocities in the process of that task. It is lucidly obvious that the work done with the concrete seriousness is less likely to results in failures; on the other hand, the task fundaments based on the risks is more prone to face the drawbacks.
Next case embraced my idea is that the opportunity of the slow but well-defined program for resulting sooner is more than the chance of the task based on the risks. It is explicit as the crystal that as the experience faces the failure, it has to start over. These repetitions can cause the process of that specific task is prolonged more than the expectation. In contrast, a well-organized job, even with the long span of time for each phase of it, can result sooner; inasmuch as there is no repetition. A vivid example can be given to shed a light on the subject is my own example. My friend and I were working on the final project in the university. My friend, who is an easygoing person, just preferred to work on the project with the plausible solutions based on the examination of each till to find the appropriate one. In contrary, I programmed a comprehensive schedule for this project. Although this preparation of program took more time, I presented the solution in a short period with the accurate result.
To wrap it up, based on the all aforementioned reasons, one can logically draw the conclusion that the modern society is more eager to a usage of slowly but more guaranteed outcome; since the currently organized scheme of work does not plead the risk and drawback. Besides, the correct work even with the slow process is more eager to result up.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment – doing things they like to do – rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? the ability to maintain a friendship with a small number of people over a long period is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 73
- tpo17 86
- tpo48 85
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of weather and 50
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.22641509434 0.229887763892 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.139622641509 0.158761421928 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0943396226415 0.0866891130778 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0452830188679 0.046263068375 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0320754716981 0.0685040099705 47% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137735849057 0.118717715034 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0396226415094 0.0351676179071 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.79138718686 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0245283018868 0.0309702414327 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00566037735849 0.00188951952338 300% => OK
Determiners: 0.160377358491 0.0887237588012 181% => Less determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0132075471698 0.0209618222197 63% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00754716981132 0.0139019557991 54% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2809.0 2387.08602151 118% => OK
No of words: 482.0 408.028673835 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82780082988 5.86048508987 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48200974243 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.311203319502 0.338922669872 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.261410788382 0.251872472559 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.188796680498 0.174417080927 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.132780082988 0.112833075102 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79138718686 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520746887967 0.524397521467 99% => OK
Word variations: 61.5315581994 59.2087087015 104% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.9523809524 20.5533526081 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7475092346 48.84282405 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.761904762 120.699889404 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9523809524 20.5533526081 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.644075263715 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 49.0934597906 45.7405998639 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.86086956522 1.45489161554 128% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320314049761 0.300154397459 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.134392042561 0.103427244359 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.08132816679 0.0752933317313 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.593197904657 0.497263757937 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165511112462 0.151897553556 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146696355023 0.114077575197 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578449432577 0.0781384742642 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.630599396825 0.336927656856 187% => Paragraphs have same ideas.
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0871340581003 0.067059652881 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259780210412 0.210909579961 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187631406213 0.0618886996521 30% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.86379928315 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.