Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People have been using cars for a long time, and they depended on cars in many activities they used to do. Personally, I do not think the number cars will decrease in the next 20 years. In contrast, I believe that the number and the demanding will increase. I feel this way for several reasons which I will explain in the following essay.
First of all, a good public transportation is not available in all countries in the world, so the demanding on cars in these countries would not become fewer. And even if a good public transportation is offered, there are many people who prefer to have their own cars. I remember when I was in Finland, where the transportation is very good, that there were many students using their cars to come to the university. This supports the idea that some people would still using their private cars instead of train, metro, and buses.
Secondly, the demanding on cars, nowadays, is more than it used to be in the past. In fact, by the offers they make, cars companies encourage individuals to buy and own their cars. While buying a car required a lot of money in the past, now it is affordable to buy a car with low budget. Moreover, this affordability makes people able to satisfy their wishes or dreams to own a specific type and models of cars. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I have been always wanted to buy a BM car, but I could not do that until the company made a special offer on some of the models thy sale.
To conclude, I am of the opinion that cars won’t be fewer in the next years. This because that not all countries have good transportation to use, and because that having a car in these days is more affordable than past.
- AGREE OR DISAGREE It is important to keep your old friend than it is to make new friends. 60
- A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a “burning mirror”: a polished copper surface curved to focus 80
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the followingstatement?it is better to have broad knowledge ofmany academic subjects than to specialize inone specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples tosupport your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment—doing things theylike to do—rather than doing things they should. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...s the idea that some people would still using their private cars instead of train, me...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 471, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have always been
...ence is a compelling example of this. I have been always wanted to buy a BM car, but I could not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 578, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...til the company made a special offer on some of the models thy sale. To conclude, I ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the models thy sale. To conclude, I am of the opinion that cars won't...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, i feel, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49520766773 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57825298596 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504792332268 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9449909311 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.9375 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220211517703 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762190235644 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449842497957 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13982584955 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466440206793 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.