Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In recent time, there are a lot of criteria have been changed due to vast advancement in all the life aspects. Moreover, it has been argued that some people claim it is better for the youngsters to choose their parents jobs. On the other hand, another people said it is better for their children to choose a variety of jobs that differ from them. From my point of view i definitely agree with the latter opinion for a lot of reasons. And each side has pros and cons. To substantiate my case, these paragraphs will illustrate my view to collaborate my preference.
To begin with, selection different jobs that are far away from the parents majors would be advantageous for a number of reasons. the first and the foremost reason come to the mind is strength the diversity in the family. In other words, by presence different majors it means different way of thinking that will enable them to manage any issue in their life aspects. For example, if there is a economic problem, some of them will think on the issue from practical perspective and think how to overcome this problem. In contrast others will think from social perspective to solve this problem.
Moreover, the second vital pint which should be taken into consideration is choosing the future carrier depend on the community need. To illustrate this point, if the parents fields have filled in the community it means choosing the same parents carrier will be useless, and without actual goal. So, the future job decision should be taken after studying the community needs that will help a lot to identify where are the shortages.
All in all, while following the parents jobs may seems good, I totally believe that permit to children to choose what they feel better to them with slight help from their parents is much better for them, because they have to build up their life and future.
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 70
- tpo 27 81
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 50
- tpo29 73
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the president of Amburg's Chamber of Commerce."Last October the city of Belleville installed high-intensity lighting in its central business district, and vandalism there declined wit 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e advantageous for a number of reasons. the first and the foremost reason come to t...
^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... life aspects. For example, if there is a economic problem, some of them will thi...
^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... think how to overcome this problem. In contrast others will think from social perspecti...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, for example, in contrast, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74922600619 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41526550548 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513931888545 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.901287387 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.266666667 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294272845023 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944233724283 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985638776863 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184666421535 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657829626318 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.