Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
There have been several disputed discussion on whether it is better to have broad knowledge of many academic sujects or specialize in one subject. As for everything, there are always two sides to every question. Personally, I believe that one should be specialize in one specific subject. I feel this for two reasons, which I explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the first reason is that specialization in one subject helps in the increasing of productivity as well as efficiency; moreover it makes our mind more analytical as compare to broad knowledge of many subjects. My personal experience is a compelling example of this; about 10 years ago, due to my good marks and high approached towards physics,I decided to major in Btech general.Nonetheless, I found in said major that there was little glimpse of physics and it included only broad knowlege of subjects like chemistry, math,analytical sceince etc. These subjects decreased my productivity as well as efficiency. Thus, I decided to change to my major in physics only. As I grew up, I got placed in ISRO, scientific research department of Indian Government, where my work was to do research in physics methods; thus, specialization in one subjects increases the chances of your success in the future.
Besides, the second reason is that specialisation in one subject helps in to achieve success in the future; furthermore, It also helps in to open the consultancy business. for better understanding, let us take the example of my brother, About 5 years ago, he enrolled in Chartered Secretary exams, he has an interest in Indirect business. As he cleared the exams, he opened his own consultancy Company where he gave consultancy related to tax planning related to good and service tax; moreover, his recent balance sheet showed that he gained double networth as compare to his networth in initial stage of business; therefore, specialization in one subject increases the chances of achievement of your own goals.
In conclusion, although there are some scenarios where broad knowledge of many subjects weighted more than specialization in one subject,howbeit, these scenarios are very rare; as a result, I believe that specialzation in one subject is better than broad knowledge of many subject because it increaes the chances of success in the future as well as increase your efficiency level.
- Sea otters are a small mammal that lives in the waters along North America's west coast from California to Alaska. A few years ago some of the sea otter populations off of the Alaskan coast started to decline rapidly and raised several concerns beca 73
- The lecture discusses about the feeding habit and the nature of R. Robustus either it is a scavenger or a hunter. The passage suggests that R. robustus have trait that make it more similar to the scavangers . But the lecturer states that there are many ev 71
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 60
- LOYALTY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT QUALITY IN CHOOSING A FRIEND 65
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'specialized'?
Suggestion: specialized
...ersonally, I believe that one should be specialize in one specific subject. I feel this fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...arks and high approached towards physics,I decided to major in Btech general.Nonet...
^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nonetheless
...ics,I decided to major in Btech general.Nonetheless, I found in said major that there was l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , analytical
...nowlege of subjects like chemistry, math,analytical sceince etc. These subjects decreased m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 784, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment of Indian Government, where my work was to do research in physics methods; t...
^^
Line 11, column 173, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ps in to open the consultancy business. for better understanding, let us take the e...
^^^
Line 17, column 137, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , howbeit
... more than specialization in one subject,howbeit, these scenarios are very rare; as a re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 269, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun subject seems to be countable; consider using: 'many subjects'.
Suggestion: many subjects
...bject is better than broad knowledge of many subject because it increaes the chances of succ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, as to, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18652849741 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14915528113 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507772020725 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 115.648314058 48.9658058833 236% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.0 100.406767564 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6923076923 20.6045352989 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3076923077 5.45110844103 244% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375326937259 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134313535552 0.076458572812 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135102281748 0.0737576698707 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252697099562 0.150856017488 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126286090546 0.0645574589148 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 58.1214874552 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.