Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
As everything in life is like a coin that has two different slides, people must weigh the pros and cons before jumping to conclusions. After all, each and every question or topic requires a careful deliberation in that there are multiple variables to a truth. Even though some may adamantly believe that it's better to work three days a week for long hours, I strongly believe this opinion lacks coherence to some extent. In my humble opinion, working for five days a week for short hours is better due to the following reasons.
First and foremost, the majority of individuals would agree with the notion that working for six hours a day can engender a myriad of advantages. the main reason behind this rationale is that people will have a couple of hours free to do whatever they want. In addition to this, most people these days are looking for free time in order to take several courses, which improves their qualities and credentials for better. However, working for shorter hours can also help individuals to get some rest. To illustrate more thoroughly, Last year my uncle Ahmad has been working for 10 hours every day in a software company. this thing reflected in a bad way in his health as well as his personality, so I asked him to apply for a new job in Microsoft company in which he was accepted in later. Also, his time works shortened in his new company to 6 hours a day with 4 days a week, so after a while he was able to improve his quality by taking C++ coursed in his free time. Then, he becomes more relaxed and comfortable than he ever was. All in all, we can't and shouldn't overlook the upsides of having a comfortable job.
On top of this, working three days a week for long hours can result in unfavorable ramifications. In the eyes of many people in present-day society, people work for long hours on a day will not have enough time to see their families. Moreover, this kind of work is exhausting for the human body and could do serious damage. A great example of this would be my brother Abed last year, he was working for a security company called "Safety". he was doing a great job there and making a lot of money, but he has to work in 3 days a week for almost all day. After that, he got a serious problem in his eyes in which he stopped working for three months in order to maintain his eyes health from being exhausted. Long story short, it's clear as day to me that working for many hours can be detrimental.
In summation, it's virtually impossible to provide a completely satisfying answer to an open-ended question. Although the jury may be out in this given essay, we can come to a mutual agreement that working for five hours a week for short hours is more enjoyable than working for 3 days a week for long hours due to the reasons and details mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern- 70
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called Phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rap 71
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks, so they called 3
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible.First, atmospheric 75
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ay can engender a myriad of advantages. the main reason behind this rationale is th...
^^^
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... hours every day in a software company. this thing reflected in a bad way in his hea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... software company. this thing reflected in a bad way in his health as well as his personalit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1048, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rtable than he ever was. All in all, we cant and shouldnt overlook the upsides of ha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1057, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...an he ever was. All in all, we cant and shouldnt overlook the upsides of having a comfor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...rity company called 'Safety'. he was doing a great job there and making ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, well, while, after all, as to, in addition, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2301.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 514.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4766536965 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5542287274 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498054474708 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2680327656 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.590909091 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393484465507 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131927145781 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931913320884 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271291016718 0.150856017488 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034318573456 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.