Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for the government to spend
money on art museums and concert halls than on
recreational facilities such as swimming pools and
playgrounds.
In the modern era, allocating budgets appropriately is an arduous task for every government. Since the needs and desires of citizens of a country can change steadily or gradually, authorities may come across to severe problems to equip each part of society with enough facilities. The controversial question which arises here is whether spending money on art museums and concert halls more critical for government or on recreational facilities such as swimming pools. Although each of them is a very crucial element in society, but I personally go for the second option. There are numerous reasons to support my answer, two of which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First of all, no one can cast a shadow of doubt on the importance of exercising and sports. It is conspicuous that nowadays, a vast majority of people suffer from different illnesses and diseases. A widespread sickness emanates from people’s lifestyles. As most men and women work for long hours a day, mostly behind a computer desk, they need to get enough exercise each day. Take a personal experience as an example. Last year I worked as a member of a research group for a big company. Obviously, my job was a more sedentary one; my back started to bother me from the very first days. So as I continued to work for that company, gradually, my efficiency declined; therefore, I decided to put working out in a local gym into my schedule. The results were extraordinary. After three months, I got a promotion and a raise in salary.
The second indisputable reason to mention is that exercising will provide suitable time to distant from one’s job. It is essential because most people work in big companies which put a lot of responsibility on their shoulders. In these short breaks from working, people can spend time on their health. By this means, not only people will maintain their physical health, but also they can work more efficiently. A recent study conducted in Germany depicts this phenomenon in one sentence. People who work out on a daily basis, get promotions within a company more frequently. In this manner, I believe providing recreational facilities is a win-win choice.
To encapsulate, I cling to the idea that says governments should spend more money on recreational facilities instead of art museums. It is anticipated that, in the near future, most of the big companies will endow large spaces for their employees in the company itself. In this regard, an excellent rapport will form between the company and the employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-06 | mohamadjhr | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | mohamadjhr | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Advertising is the most important cause of unhealthyeating habits. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents do not understand their children as well asparents did 50 years ago. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Professional athletes, such as football and basketball players, do not deserve the high salaries that they are paid. 73
- optimistic or not optimistic 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97882352941 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92624539482 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6855622222 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.64 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.88709677419 307% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134042134267 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321112611375 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600186708693 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877233971144 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651846717703 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.