Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Governments are responsible for offering services to their citizens, and they should look for common interests while they are making their strategies. Personally, I think that governments should spend more money to improve the basic services rather than spending money on secondary services. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, according to many public policy experts, education, health, and public transportation are the most important services that states should offer them to the people. And making decisions that improve the quality of these services is crucial. Moreover, if public transportation is not efficient, many negative impacts will occur on different aspects, such as the job market and tourism. My experience is a compelling example of this. While I was working for a marketing company, I used to come late to work because of the bad transportation network that was in my city.
Secondly, improving internet access would only be beneficial for only few groups of society. Not all people in society need a high speed and quality of the internet in their daily life. In fact, a minimum of internet access will be enough for them to use internet. On the other hand, all people in the community need very good transportation in their life. For instance, children use buses to go to schools, workers use trains to get to workplaces, old use metro to go to hospitals. But not all members of these groups need to have a high quality of internet access.
Lastly, people who need to have very good internet service, such as technology companies, should pay extra money for getting this service. Additionally, these companies make huge numbers of profits yearly, so they will not be affected if they spend a little bit more money on the services they need. In this way, the government spend its budget in the right way toward the improvements of the essential services.
To conclude, governments should spend more money to improve public transportation. This is because it is a very important service for each individual in society and a large number of people need to use this service in their everyday life.
- the settlements of Chaco Canyon in NewMexico. great houses. 3
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 85
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 73
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 428, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'getting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: getting
...es to go to schools, workers use trains to get to workplaces, old use metro to go to h...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 252, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ey will not be affected if they spend a little bit more money on the services they need. I...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 166, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...vice for each individual in society and a large number of people need to use this service in thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se this service in their everyday life.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i feel, i think, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0521978022 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7847048803 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2438281664 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7894736842 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1578947368 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84210526316 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238113339936 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840710021724 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828472553133 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147173505401 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455666913361 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.