Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is often not a good idea to move to a new city or a
new country because you will lose old friends.
Since the dawn of civilization, human beings were migrating, either by their choice or by the force of the circumstances. They usually faced several constraints on the long way of migration; they should abandon their assets and friends. So hard is it to make a long-lasting friendship that makes it hard to choose to stay or leave. When it comes to this point, some controversies arise whether it is not a good idea to move to a new country or a new city because of the loss of old friends. Personally, I disagree with the statement. In the following lines, I will present and investigate two reasons to substantiate my response.
The first reason is that life is an adventure chance that only is given to a person once. Living in one place for whole life, convert people's life to a boring life and rarely can it provide excitement for them. Instead, living in various places more resembles an adventure; people can experience many new things and never do their life get boring. Also, they can make new friends and learn a lot from them, but in comparison people who live all of their life in a place, usually get depressed and in many cases associating with friends also can not help them. For instance, I studied my bachelor's degree in a university far from my home town. Initially, I was agitated, but as time went on, I found new friends and experienced many worthwhile things. If I did not withstand the first hardship of separation from my friends, I would not be able to have such a pleasant experience.
The second reason is that people can have a more wide community around them. With all the new technologies in this modern world, migration does not mean isolation. People can connect their friends easily by phone and video calls, and can share their experiences. People can invite their old friends, and they can have a broader community if they let their new and old friends become friends with each other. In comparison, People who do not try any migration during their life always have a limited number of friends around them. In the same example, since I had started my studies in a new city, I had more friends compared with my home town friends.
In summary, having analyzed the preceding arguments and reasons, one can soon surmise that moving to a new city does not mean losing old friends. It is because not only can people do some adventures but also they may have a broader community of friends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | Honey_ashr | 70 | view |
- tpo 40 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Advertising is the most important cause of unhealthyeating habits. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Advertising is the most important cause of unhealthyeating habits. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students who keep their rooms neat and organized will be more likely to succeed than students who do not 44
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is often not a good idea to move to a new city or a new country because you will lose old friends 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s compared with my home town friends. In summary, having analyzed the preceding ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, while, for instance, in summary, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65348837209 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61545103176 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502325581395 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9782510137 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4761904762 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04761904762 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179884110772 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613666213209 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777107811322 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137885546217 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749050314765 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.