Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?!n today' s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and " make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, more and more students are concerned about if It is better to work fast and risk making mistakes or work slowly and “make sure everything is correct”. Some people argues that work fast and risking mistake is butter while others holds that we should work slowly and make sure everything is right. A agree with the second argument because of the following reasons.
Firstly, working faster and risk making mistakes is however a waste of time. Work faster means we will have a bigger opportunity to make mistakes, if we make mistakes, we will spend a lot of time trying to solve the mistake you made, sometimes we even have to redo all the things you have done before, for example, if we are solving a math equitation quickly and make a mistake at last, we will have to calculate the whole equation again, it will spend you twice the time than you do it slowly and check everything. You do not to do something one and one again if you are working slowly and “make sure everything is all right.
Secondly, we should focus more on qualities than quantities, according to a investigation, people will feel worried and uncomfortable when they are doing work fast because he face the opportunity of making mistakes. In the end, he will make more mistakes because he is always worried.
All in all, work fast and risk making mistakes can cause a series of problems including causing the product’s quality lower and face more problems. It is obviously not good for both workers and companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...owly and make sure everything is right. A agree with the second argument because ...
^
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...owly and make sure everything is right. A agree with the second argument because of the...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...qualities than quantities, according to a investigation, people will feel worried...
^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'faces'.
Suggestion: faces
...hen they are doing work fast because he face the opportunity of making mistakes. In ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 52.1666666667 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 263.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77186311787 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64245698185 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 212.727598566 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494296577947 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.132326341 48.9658058833 221% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 125.5 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373076145268 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166452758684 0.076458572812 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847455355541 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230373780429 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102581101119 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 86.8835125448 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.