In the modern era, education is considered a crucial factor contributing to the success rate of people in their lives. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the comparison between the amount of participation of parents in their child’s illiteracy process then and now. Many people adhere to the view that parents nowadays do not bother themselves with the education of their teenagers, while others acknowledge the growth of their collaboration in young people’s academic lives. I firmly believe that parents are more involved in their kids’ education than before. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
The first exquisite point that I want to mention is that the importance of education has vividly increased since previous decades. Thirty years ago, education was not regarded as an essential matter however, in contemporary time, it is considered one of the factors that facilitate the development of society. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. From elementary school until high school, my mother has supervised my grades by constantly talking with my teacher and asking their opinions about me. During my junior high school, my mom always helped me to solve my problems while staying up all night with me assisting to prepare for the upcoming classes. She kept telling me to extend my knowledge to get a proper position and do my best to serve society.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that our grandparents and their ancestors didn’t have enough educational skills to help the next generations. As a result, their involvement in our parents’ studies was not considerable. On the other hand, nowadays, adults have plenty of knowledge in various fields which can be used to aid their kids to overcome numerous academic problems. To put it in a more vivid picture, when I was in high school, I had a friend named Ali, whose father was a math professor and his mother was a biology teacher. Because they knew plenty of other subjects rather than their field of study, he spent a huge amount of time with them figuring out the solution to different problems. Thus, Ali did not have a single problem in any of his lessons related.
In sum, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that the presence of parents in the process of youth illiteracy has been intensified. Because, people have become more aware of the importance of education in their child’s future, and they have adequate information to aid their teenagers in resolving their difficulties in assorted areas.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 83
- The extended family is less important now than it was in the past. 90
- Do you agree or disagree ?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, thus, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2223.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12211981567 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92420642987 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573732718894 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3485939341 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8421052632 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.10526315789 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244402620561 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823902695037 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937382857086 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161056914979 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885285493339 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.