Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Determining whether the parents are involved in children's education is very important issue. With this knowledge more precise decisions can be made by the governments and educational programmers. This may lead to designing better educational programs by considering the involvement of parents and its results in past and now. Some may think nowadays they are more involved in their education while others may disagree. In my view, parents are more informed and involved in their children's education today rather than past because of two main reasons.
The main reason is that, Nowadays parents are themselves more educated than the past. These days, because of the progresses of technology, parents have been in high levels of schools. In the past, almost all jobs were done by means of hand and labor and people did not need to be educated to do their jobs. As a result, they could not help the children with their school homework. For example, in my childhood, I needed help to do my homework and ask my questions from someone but my father was a cook and was not educated to help me with that. However, now, my cousin helps her children with their homework and problems because she is an engineer herself. As you can see, parents being educated leads them to more involvement in their children's education.
The other reason is that, throughout the meetings being held regularly in schools nowadays the parents are being more informed of the children's' educational status. These days it is common that schools are arranging meetings every month to inform the parents about the children's' status. In these meetings parents meet with the teachers and the staff of the school so they can ask and seek for the solutions that their children's are encountering in school and education. For instance, my cousin attends in these kinds of meeting monthly and as a result she can help her children with their problems better. However, in the past when I was in elementary school my parents even did not know which level I was in. It is obvious that today are more involved in the children's' education than the past.
In sum, though some may disagree, nowadays parents are more informed and involved in the children's education. Not only do parents are more able to help them because of their own educational levels but also they are more informed of the children's status in school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | haneennazar | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | yqkqknct | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Seema Modak | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | kameice | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | salarmoheb | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska’s North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold, arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, the environment of the North S 3
- The main reason of sea ottor's population decrement 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 73
- The methods of saving plants from distinction 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88613861386 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55323191974 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430693069307 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1549309723 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.7 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36588486021 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150697697065 0.076458572812 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844092382089 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266722218458 0.150856017488 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335035589783 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.