Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I agree that parents today are more involved in their children's education then were parents in the past.
First of all, parents always hope their children be able to be successful, and since education is much more connected with the ability to do great work and succeed, parents are more involved in children's education. In the present days, an increasing amount of work requires a strong understanding of certain knowledge instead of repeated chores, which makes education rather important that the knowledge is usually taught through education system. For example, the works of many of my friends are highly related to the materials covered in the college. They are required to come up with advanced algorithms and help the company solve hard problems.
Secondly, the world today are more inter-connected than before, which means that in order to make their children able to communicate and work with foreigners, they are required to make more efforts in their children's education. Without training in schools and learn more foreign languages, people are prone to be replaced by others because there are more and more international companies today. For example, my aunt, Vivian, is fluent in Chinese, English, Japanese and Spanish. Due to her good language experiences cultivated in schools, she got higher position soon after she entered the company. When there are international meetings, Vivian are always able to make everything on the right track.
Therefore, based on the above statements, I totally agree with the idea that parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | haneennazar | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | yqkqknct | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Seema Modak | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | kameice | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | salarmoheb | 70 | view |
- TPO44 Integrated 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 75
- TPO42 Integrated 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO 28 Integrated 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 261.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30651340996 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70658673961 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 212.727598566 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3830916844 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.909090909 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351062389096 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142282774501 0.076458572812 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180994750633 0.0737576698707 245% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320343577344 0.150856017488 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166266572085 0.0645574589148 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.