Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment—doing things they
like to do—rather than doing things they should do.
Nowadays people live in very different kinds of live conditions, but even these differences they share some specialities about their life. In my opinion people had had almost same live circumstances and this situations were really easy than today living condition. In this reason I disagree with this statement and I am going to explain same specific example why am I disagree with this statement.
Firstly, people had lived in easier live condition rather than today beacuse people have to work much longer in modern world. It is making more diffucult their life who are living in modern world order. For example, the most of the people had worked in farmland or these people had just go to forest to cut tree or they had related with similarity jobs who had lived in Turkey in before the modern world. These jobs had not really hard to people, besides that they had been working apportimately five or six hour in a day in their farmland or forest. However, nowadays people have to work more than eight hours in different kinds of area in a day in Turkey. Moreover, these works situation really tight than past one beacuse of this reason people could not spend their time for on personal enjoyment.
Secondly, people are not be able to spend too much time on personal enjoyment beacuse they have to spend their time for transport in metropol. In other definition people have to spend their time on road who are employeers in a company or students at different kinds of schools. All these people have to use public transportation for get their campus or company area and it is taken huge time form them. However, most probably people had lived in small areas and these small areas provide really short desins? for them. In the other words, they did not have to travel much for their schools or working areas. In this result, people had had much more time for their enjoyment things.
Finally, people have to much more care of their healthy than past. It is another reason why people could spend their time for enjoyable things. Even medicen and surge are implemented by people. It is not enough to protect to human healty and people have to interest in their healty who are getting older. However, in the past people had been eaten very health and organic things such as fruit, meat or vegatables, but nowadays people could not find these kind of foods.
In the conlucision, people could not spend their time for enjoyment things beacuse of all these reason. They have gives their time for working hard, go to campuses or working areas or care of thier healthy. All in all people mostly spend their time for these responsibilities.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 70
- Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 60
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how theyoppose specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
... about their life. In my opinion people had had almost same live circumstances and this...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... had almost same live circumstances and this situations were really easy than today ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 509, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
... been working apportimately five or six hour in a day in their farmland or forest. H...
^^^^
Line 2, column 675, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'works'' or 'work's'?
Suggestion: works'; work's
...rea in a day in Turkey. Moreover, these works situation really tight than past one be...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...people have to spend their time on road who are employeers in a company or students at ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...mall areas provide really short desins? for them. In the other words, they did not ...
^^^
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...r working areas. In this result, people had had much more time for their enjoyment thin...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 23, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...njoyment things. Finally, people have to much more care of their healthy than pa...
^^
Line 4, column 450, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...les, but nowadays people could not find these kind of foods. In the conlucision, people...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for example, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2176.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73043478261 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34711744539 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426086956522 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 673.2 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1891361772 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6086956522 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91304347826 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148493053617 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587214845405 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450637824496 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10329711305 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122997943307 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.