Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Views vary when it comes to whether teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Some people might reckon teachers are as appreciated as before, however, I agree with the statement that teachers are more respectful and valued in the past. The reason is that the risen of the internet, which provides abundant and accessible information, replace teachers in many different aspects.
To begin with, the main function of teachers is to delay professional knowledge, but the internet can substantially deliver tremendous knowledge any place and any time. For example, when I was in the college, my professor gave lectures in the class and assigned many assignments after class. Some assignments were extremely difficult to find enough information based on the lectures to deliver sound answers, so I had to surf on the internet to find out more information or background knowledge. Since there was no limit information on the internet, I could absorb as much as I wanted, and organized those information to my paper. Hence, it can be inferred that a person can approach more knowledge on the basis of the internet.
In addition, teachers sometimes deliver speeches based on their subjective perspectives. On the other hand, the internet can provide more information from more than one perspective. For example, when I was in my junior high, I recalled there was a controversial issue regarding homosexual marriage, and my teacher told me that it was unnatural and horrified, for this contracted with the evolutionary rules. At that time, I didn't realize how complicated this issue was and simply accepted what teacher said. However, when I grew up and looked through some discussion on the internet, I figured that there were much more perspectives. Some of them disagreed with my teacher's argument, claiming that same-sex marriage should be legalized because every person has the right to marry the person they love. Therefore, I think the only perspective from a teacher is far away from enough, and the internet can otherwise provide us various perspectives.
Thirdly, while some people are convinced that teachers always tell the right things, I recognize that sometimes teacher might be wrong if they didn't catch up the newest knowledge. For example, I remembered one of my science teachers told me there were only nine planets in the solar system. However, after decades of exploring, the scientist discovered the tenth planet in the solar system, and they published their discovery on the website with detailed orientation. Hence, it can be inferred that internet somehow can provide the newest and more accurate information compared to the teacher.
Consequently, based on the adequate justifications mentioned above, we can safely arrive at the conclusion that teachers were more appreciated or valued in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ssible information, replace teachers in many different aspects. To begin with, the main fu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...sorb as much as I wanted, and organized those information to my paper. Hence, it can be inferred ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nowledge on the basis of the internet. In addition, teachers sometimes deliver ...
^^^
Line 7, column 425, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...the evolutionary rules. At that time, I didnt realize how complicated this issue was ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 144, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ometimes teacher might be wrong if they didnt catch up the newest knowledge. For exam...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, for example, i think, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2589.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2303030303 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87830653428 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480808080808 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 822.6 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.994746239 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.565217391 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5217391304 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378040122752 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127146249457 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144884650724 0.0737576698707 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298713394318 0.150856017488 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.292150613378 0.0645574589148 453% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.