Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout the whole history, people have perennially been concerned about the issue of traning the human. Thereofre, it is not far-fetched to presume that teachers' status has been alway precious in the societies. However, this respectful attitude to what extent has been changed within years is considered as a contentious issue. There is a growing segment of peole who contend this idea that in the past, lecturers were more appreciated rather than nowadays. I personally concur with this idea and in the ensuing paragraph, the rationale behind this opiniion will be firther elaborated.
The first and most exquisite point which coming to the mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with role of teachers in the societies in the past. Hardly can anyone deny the fact that the previous individuals had access to far less occupations in comparision in today's life. In fact, most of the jobs were emerged and worked as a one solidify career. Undoubtedlym teaching is amongst those career which is traced back to the primitive human civilizations. Indeed, teachers' respponsibilities were beyond mere education and transferring the knowledge to the next generation. They undertook wide range of duties due to their wisdome, from giving the advice in order to lead the adults to even establishing various regulations. Needless to say that in such curcumstances, teachers were admired remarkebaley higher that modern tuitors who just teach the children, even though they undergone heavy duty as trainers of the next generation.
Another vitalpoint which should be taken into considearion is that the modern societies become overally less appreciating. In the current state of affais we face, in which so busy are poeple with their own lives that rarely do they pay attention to the life of their counterparts. Previously, having care about each other, individuals behave more respectfully. Nowadays, all the people just as means to deliver their duties in the best possible way, regardless of the effort which have been done.
According to the latest research attributing to Dr. kevin. Rud, a prominet and well-respected professor in the university of Macquarie, the sense of thanksfulness decrease in people substntially, and individuals are reluctant to appreciate the favor assiting them become better a person in their lives. Subsequently, this probe corroborates further legitimacy for this idea that all the jobs including teacher do not admired as much as deserved in contemporary scoieties.
To wrap it up, it is more judicous to say that people no longer allocate sufficient value for the teacher. Not only did teachers have accepted a wide array of duties in the past and was therefore more admiareble, but also today's indivudals do not incline to behave appreciatedly anymore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
..., it is not far-fetched to presume that teachers status has been alway precious in the s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tantiate my standpoint is concerned with role of teachers in the societies in the...
^^
Line 2, column 238, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun occupations is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... previous individuals had access to far less occupations in comparision in todays li...
^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... past and was therefore more admiareble, but also todays indivudals do not inclin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2358.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31081081081 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02948189148 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592342342342 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7045431369 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.80952380952 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198366270789 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512451099651 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523642849237 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100935961067 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383030807379 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.