Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Fortunately, we are all citizens now with all of our rights and duties. It is delightful having free will and access to education, but is not right neglect the choices of our government, or ignore what they do with the power that we concede. Of course, as everything that it is going to be done, is needed knowledge, then is required a mentor. This mentor should be highly ready to make a thinking living being, and that is an important task because an individual action can have an enormous effect.

A society face up to many questions and dilemmas, some of them are of ethical, moral and ideological nature and it is up to the citizen taking a position but with consistent reasons and being able to discuss them politely. Naturally, the education of a citizen starts as soon as he is born, goes through the family teachings and is completed by the social interactions that remain throughout life. Both family and persons, which compound a civilization, have their own formed mind, but they need to hold that children and teenagers still learning and growing up. Impose ideological concepts forces them to defend a point with none particular point of view and a few may hold positions without having arguments and are totally closed mind.

In order to optimize and make a sustainable evolution, we need specimens of human kind that think outside the box, able to see the big picture. Leading the next generations there is a duty of each mentor and they should be the example in how you make a statement being open to discuss and change positions if it is up to. Teachers inside the classroom must show how the politic machine works, all of their sides, pros and cons, but the decision of a position is particular and should not be forced.

In the end, any citizen should be able to take positions and argue about questions. However, when it is time to teach someone they need to be impartial. Self-control is the key point for a gentlemanly coexistence. People must be respectful for everyone and every opinion, liking or not. No one holds the absolute truth and the diversity of thoughts open the way ahead of us, similarly as biodiversity preserves the natural life.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-01 PRACHI DAVE 70 view
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by user ueslenbresolin :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little may'.
Suggestion: little may
...ith none particular point of view and a few may hold positions without having arguments...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gentlemanly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('coexistence') instead of another adjective.
...tial. Self-control is the key point for a gentlemanly coexistence. People must be respectful for everyone...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, similarly, so, still, then, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73947368421 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67020468781 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571052631579 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1591404904 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5625 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134556501337 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368859424947 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370588509142 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767712081335 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482244244846 0.0645574589148 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.