Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Technology is one thing today we all depended upon it, It's vital for us. Without technology like computer, smartphones etc. We cannot live our life more comfortable. Some people believe that technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Others disagree. In my view, technology has not made children less creative for two essential reasons.
The main reason is that using a technology like youtube application the children can learn a lot. There are tons of videos on youtube that we can see and improve our creativity in a short period. For example, when I was in 9th grade there were not that watch videos in the youtube, but now if you just type in a search bar in few seconds we will get a ton of videos related to that topic. Brightside is a youtube channel where we will get to know more about artworks and also how to use things effectively like cleaning of copper glass with lemon and also many more hacks using household items. As you can see, this youtube channel has more than 15 millions subscribers in this many of them may be children all of them are improving their creative skills if it was not like past then we would not have learned such a fantastic hack in our life.
Another reason is that technology giving us more education in one place. If a child wants to create some project for their school means youtube videos or websites which helps a lot. For example, My cousin has a project, in that he has to do forest miniature where youtube helps him a lot like he got an idea how to build, collect and what all material can be used to look it beautiful and so on. He made a list of all, eventually, he builds a forest miniature it was too good he just used the idea that turns out very well by seeing that all his teachers praised him and also he got a prize for his original work. This experience taught me that technology like youtube applications have an outstanding impact on this generation children, without the help of youtube ideas it did not have turned that good.
In sum, technology has made children more creative than they were in past. Not only they will learn but also they will get a lot of information from technology. So everyone should use technology for their faster improvement of skill.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Tharwat | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | star435 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Isioma Nwayor | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- It has recently been announced that a new movie theater may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...e children more creative than they were in past. Not only they will learn but also they...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, second, so, then, well, as to, for example, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51707317073 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44173020642 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514634146341 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7785215082 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205677848426 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859199838601 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111400014149 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161180664415 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855101595389 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.