Technology has hugely developed nowadays and people have access to various things that were not accessible in the past.Personally, I believe that technology did not decrease the creativity of children. There are several reasons why I think this and this will be the focus of my essay.
First, Internet has widely spread and it has helped the children with several learning tools to widen their mind and increase their creativity. Our childhood is an important part of our life that helps us succeed in the future. My personal example is a compelling example of this. About five years ago, i enrolled in an ICT class in my school and I had to learn how to use the internet. This has opened tonnes of doors for me by in which i started looking up for lessons online that could help me get a good grade in my IGCSE's. After watching millions of videos on Youtube, I got the highest mark in my class which helped me get a scholarship for my undergraduate studies and I owe all of this to today's technology.
Secondly, working at a young age can help them gain so many experiences that they could make use of in the future. There are several jobs in the internet such as designing, selling and many others opportunities that could make children more creative. For instant, my cousin had a spelling me that he wanted to get in but he did not have the money to participate. Moreover, he started working at an online website as a shirt designer and it turned out to be that he is incredible at designing . Nevertheless, he got the money he wanted for the spelling bee and got to know what his good at for his future job which was a win win.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that technology increases that creativity of children. This is because the internet gives them the opportunity to reach out for various learning tools, and because technology made it easier for children to work from a young age gaining life experiences helping them in increasing their creativity.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important aspect of a job is the money a person earns. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Personally
...gs that were not accessible in the past.Personally, I believe that technology did not decr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... example of this. About five years ago, i enrolled in an ICT class in my school a...
^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ened tonnes of doors for me by in which i started looking up for lessons online t...
^
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...to be that he is incredible at designing . Nevertheless, he got the money he wante...
^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: win
... good at for his future job which was a win win. In conclusion, I am of the opinion ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60795454545 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72899680118 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514204545455 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.3716446259 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0945294770673 0.236089414692 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397625784166 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616937202201 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773892598697 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572481610343 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.