Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Some may agree class="that">that technology makes class="children">children class="less">less active. I, however, disagree with the author's argument. technology has always class="been">been class="good">good to either class="children">children or adult.
To begin with the technology has assisted the class="children">children in education. My 5 year old nephew, class="who">who class="is">is studying in kinder-garden class="can">can fluently class="speak">speak in English class="just">just by seeing the videos on YouTube. He also has a exceptional communication skills class="than">than class="other">other class="children">children on the class class="who">who are not very used to with mobile phones and technology. Moreover, the technology has assisted the class="children">children for the fast learning. For example, the class="children">children on the remote area of nepal like Rolpa these days are able to get class="good">good grades on the secondary level conducted by national education board class="just">just by getting the online class through the medium of internet. Those class="children">children used to have the poor grades on the secondary level, as a result they were not able to compete with the city class="children">children. however, the scenario has class="been">been changed with the technology. class="other">other things remaining same, only with the advancement of technology they are able to compete on the national level competition.
Secondly, technology has provided the access to class="children">children to built their art and skills. For example, the class="children">children are able to see the different kinds of dance and songs with the help of television. So, child from nepal class="can">can practice the dancing steps performed on Italy. Not only this, the students from rural parts of country like nepal are aware of the global challenges like climate change. Bindu Bhandari, one of the junior student in nepal was selected from nepal to class="speak">speak about the climate change in the us. this class="is">is all with the advancement of the technology.
Some may argue class="that">that technology have actually made the class="children">children lazy by stating class="that">that they are these days indulged on the online games like PUBG, mobile games instead of outdoor games. To state this mean to neglect the whole positiveness class="that">that technology have helped class="children">children to be more active. one has to judge what population of the class="children">children are actually being class="less">less creative after being indulged on the games, social media and class="other">other technological things.
Thus, above all clearly states class="that">that technology have helped class="children">children to be active more class="than">than in past without the use of technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | haneennazar | 60 | view |
- The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 66
- argument 37
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 80
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...s active. I, however, disagree with the authors argument. technology has always class=&...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Technology
...er, disagree with the authors argument. technology has always class='been'>be...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eing the videos on YouTube. He also has a exceptional communication skills class=...
^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: class
...'children'>children on the class class='who'>who are not very use...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...class='children'>children. however, the scenario has class='been&apos...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1294, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
...s;>been changed with the technology. class='other'>other things remai...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 431, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...en'>children to be more active. one has to judge what population of the cla...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for example, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3010.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 7.8590078329 5.05705443957 155% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 8.9255507106 2.79657885939 319% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503916449086 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 836.1 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.2 1.59117977528 138% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 69.5133716887 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.333333333 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2380952381 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968182488117 0.243740707755 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685393330152 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465966443519 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822958699472 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149519634386 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.7 14.1392134831 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 2.44 48.8420337079 5% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 12.1743820225 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 28.31 12.1639044944 233% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.