Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex
There is a strong controversy that whether old friends are important for personal happiness or new friends; however some people hold the views of old friends are crucial for happiness in life but I believe that making new friends are not less important for happy life. In the following paragraph I will elaborate my viewpoint with two reasons.
First of all, old friend are not available in all situations in life where need. People have to move different places for various purposes. They can’t handle all the matter arises alone, they have to depend on others for helping. So it is most important to make new friends to cope up the difficult situations and make the life more comfortable and easy. A real example in my life clearly illustrate the fact; when I joined in a new university as a lecturer that is far from my home town I felt very pressure with my work. But within few days one of my junior colleague became very close to me and help me to reduce my work load by doing some by himself.
In addition, it is not true that old friend is always understand you, or keep in touch with you in your bad time or happy moment; not all old friend is close enough to console you when you are in grieve or make you happy. I have few friends whom were very close to me when I was almost 15 years old. I used to play with them, study with them but although they are still my friend but do not understand what I am like or dislike, one of them hurt me some times due to misunderstanding. Now I am 30 years old, I could not share my feelings with them because I think I have many new trustworthy friends then them.
In conclusion, although people say that ‘old is gold’ but it is not right that all old friends are make your life so comfortable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- In the United States employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day However many employees want to work a four day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employee 70
- In the United States employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day However many employees want to work a four day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employee 85
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 80
- TPO integrated writing 3 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'understood'.
Suggestion: understood
...t is not true that old friend is always understand you, or keep in touch with you in your ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, then, i think, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37689969605 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47001586479 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519756838906 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7880873136 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.769230769 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229399089701 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834969996236 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600590665478 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147639752826 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690300127279 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.42 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 86.8835125448 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.