Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends
Nowadays, people have lots of connection with others as a classmate, co-worker, friend, and so on. One of the most essential of these connections is friendship due to can be common in other types. Although a few individuals would like that have friendship with so many humans, I would rather have a relation with a certain number of individuals for an extended period instead of more ones less with a restrict time. There are several reasons for this belief, and in what follows, I will substantiate my viewpoint about some of them.
Firstly, one of the reasons leading people to have friendship with others over a long time is their emotional and daily life needs. We need someone to help us in the difficulties, such as when we have not any money, have divorced from our spouse, and so forth. A few problems cannot be said to our families like brothers or sisters, but a loyal friend known us for an extended period is the best person to talk with him and get some advice from him. For example, in the last September, I divorced from my wife. That time was a very dull and overwhelming moment for me. Vahid is my best friend since 2003. I could not talk to my family about my circumstances. But one day I called him and invited him to my apartment. After 2 hours of talking, I felt better. Thus, if we have a loyal friend for a long time, we could count on him in critical situations.
Secondly, humans want to have a relation with a few individuals for an extended period due to go somewhere like a trip, a university, their homes, and so forth. People usually go to the house of their family. However, after a few time, it could be annoying for them because they will be repetitive persons for them. So, if they can go to the home of another person like a trusted friend, it could be great. For instance, my family communicated with their neighbors about thirty years ago. They had known each other from 1970, about fifty years ago. They had fun, told jokes, enjoyed watching sport matches, and so on when they gathered together. Therefore, if you know a few individuals for a long time, you will definitely be comfortable and enjoy your moments beside them.
To conclude, humans should know a few persons for a long time to have help in difficulties and enjoy their free times when they are with each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- glass, birds, harm, injury, One-Way Glass, Colorful DesignT Magnetic Field 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or meeting is 60
- TPO1Employee, four-day workweek, united states, 80 percent, four-fifth 3
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 400, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d period instead of more ones less with a restrict time. There are several reasons for thi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...house of their family. However, after a few time, it could be annoying for them because ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51904761905 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55836629419 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488095238095 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9660618328 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5217391304 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2608695652 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08695652174 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207787578195 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061840997018 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590005785978 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146322770824 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333849126587 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.